[ad_1]
Jordan will not negotiate its sovereignty over two parts of the Jordan peace treaty between Jordan and Israel, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said on Monday. Speaking to Local Reporters, Safadi added that Amman has not yet been asked.
Should they be so, Safadi said, they would revolve around the expiration of the two annexes.
"We are a country with international standing. We said, "We are here to protect our interests," he said.
>> Jordan's king uses nixed peace treaty as payback against Trump, Netanyahu | Analysis
Safadi noted that the decision had been made over a long period of time, and that Abdullah would know how to handle it and act according to the interests of the Jordanian people.
The decision to cancel the annexes was enthusiastically welcomed by the Jordanian publi, as well as by parliament and the government.
Sources in Jordan told the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statement that Israel is planning to negotiate with the Jordanian government, there is no chance that the government would reverse the decision.
"The shot has already been fired, and the minister of the prime minister's goal, but the ramifications of reversing the decision or even the king are far more serious than extending the lease," a source said. "It would be better for the Israeli government to enter into negotiations with the Jordanian sovereignty.
According to these sources, this point is not clear in the United States, in particular the United States, so the Jordanian government is expecting pressure on this issue. "We know that the decision will be provoked by the United States, but it is unlikely that it will be possible to change it, unless there is some proposal in the diplomatic gold it will be impossible to refuse, "the source said. "But that will not happen, based on the behavior of the Netanyahu government."
There is a consensus in Jordan that the king's decision, which stems from the pressures of the domestic market and the Jordanian public, could be more flexible if the Israeli government
"There's a very good-wing government, in which some ministers see Jordan as a Palestinian state," said a source. "The undermining of the holy places in Jerusalem continues Jordanian custodianship of the holy sites, and do not forget the shooting incident at the embassy [in July 2017] that caused a lot of anger in Jordan. Israel does not allow the king or the government to make decisions that benefit. "
Abdullah's decision got wide play in the Jordanian media, which fully supported the decision, saying it was "historic" and met the expectations of the Jordanian people. The media reports of supportive responses from union leaders and top military officers. Some of the officers compared Abdullah's decision to one made by his father, King Hussein, in 1956 when he fired all the senior British officers in the Jordanian army and replaced them with Jordanian officers. It was also described as historic at the time, because it assured the independence of the Jordanian military. There were also supportive remarks from the present and forming parliamentarians and cabinet members.
The Jordanian newspaper Al Ghad noted that the king's decision took Israel totally by surprise. Al-Hayat, which is published in London, quoted Jordanian sources as saying that it was more flexible, but that it was aided by Israel's right-wing government and offensive conduct towards the holy places. Jerusalem, which did not allow any true latitude.
Under the headline: "The king won for Jordanian sovereignty," the Al Ra'i newspaper wrote that the decision was made in the United States, but also insists on its claims with regard to sovereignty.
"The king's position on the right time to thwart the plans of those who seek to clash with the opinion of the government and the palace on this issue," the paper wrote. "The decision is made with the popular and political demands that have increased in recent months."
The paper further claims that the decision is even more important Israeli policies on expanding settlements; it was important that the decision was made under international law and that it was given to the Israeli side.
Residents of Al-Bakura in the northern Jordan Valley noted the decision not only for political and diplomatic reasons, but also for economic reasons. Hassan Al-Fuaz, the mukhtar of the village, noted that the residents have been waiting for Naharayim enclave back; the land is very fertile and could be used for both agriculture and tourism.
"The area will become an attraction for Jordanians and an opportunity for the residents' economic prosperity. I hope it will happen soon, "Al-Fuaz told Al Ra'i.
[ad_2]Source link
