Jury delivers $ 25.5 million 'statement' to Aetna to change its ways | Health and Fitness

The case revolved around the 2014 denial of coverage for Orrana Cunningham, who had stage 4 nasopharyngeal cancer near her brain stem. Her doctors wanted her to receive proton beam therapy, which could have the advantage of having radiation.

Aetna denied her coverage, calling the investigational and experimental therapy.

Orrana and her husband, Ron Cunningham, retired Oklahoma City firefighter, had been together since 1987. He was determined to do whatever it took. The couple died in their homepage at GoFundMe Page to help pay the $ 92,082.19 to get the MDs at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas.

However, Orrana died on May 30, 2015, at the age of 54, in part of a viral infection that reached her brain.

Ron Cunningham said this week's verdict was vindication for the suffering his wife went through. She had filed the initial paperwork with Aetna, saying that if she helped save the life of a person, it would be worth it.

"My wife started the case, and I'm just finishing the fight," he said. "We did it proudly, my wife wanted to make sure she got out." Her comment was "we could just save one person."

"As far as money goes, I'd give it back to spend just one more day with her."

Aetna attorney John Shely said in closing arguments that the insurance companies are losing their coverage, they are also turning to face-to-face sufficiency.

It was a message that did not sit well with the 12 jurors, who found that Aetna "recklessly disregarded its duty to deal fairly and act in good faith with the Cunninghams."

"I just felt like Orrana Cunningham was failed at every turn," forewoman Ann Schlotthauer said.

She said the verdict "We definitely got a message to make a point, we wanted to make a point and get their attention."

Schlotthauer said it was clear from expert testimony that proton beam therapy was not experimental at all. She said that she is one of the most qualified medical advisers in the world.

Schlotthauer said she believed that Aetna's medical directors "rubber-stamped" the denials without doing their due diligence. "No one was looking at her specific case," she said. "That's where we decided that they were in breach of contract and should have paid for it.

"I hope [the verdict] "I'm doing it in Aetna," she said.

Juror Ora Dale cried and hugged Cunningham after the trial. She was one of two jurors who believed the monetary award should have been much higher than the $ 25.5 million.

"I just wanted to let him know that I was on his side," Dale said. "Those medical directors did not say that they did not say that they did not spend enough time on their claim.

"Aetna needed to pay." They were in the wrong, and he deserved everything that he was asking for.

Cunningham had another encounter in court. He said Shely, Aetna 's lead attorney, who' s up to him and congratulates him after the verdict.

Cunningham was an Oklahoma City firefighter when the Alfred P. Murrah building was bombed on April 19, 1995, killing 168 people and wounding hundreds more in one of the deadliest terror attacks in American history. The day after the bombing, he was assigned to combating the wreckage of the day-care center on the second floor to search for children. He said he would spray corpses with Lysol to prevent the spread of bacteria.

He'd seen the worst of the worst. But little could have been prepared for him with Aetna's attorney in the courtroom. He said he stood, stunned, trying to grasp what he'd just heard.

"That showed how callous these people are," he said.

Shely did not respond to a request for comment.

Aetna, the nationâ € ™ s third-largest insurer, declined to comment that it was appropriately used in this case, saying there is a lack of clinical data for proton therapy for treating nasopharyngeal tumors.

"While we have no comment on the rulings, we can say that we have a good motive, that we have the right to do so." "As our chief medical officer noted in this year, it is never easy to tell that this is the case.

"However, we will continue to be effective and secure, as determined by rigorous scientific studies."

Doug Terry, the lead attorney for the Cunninghams, offered a much different take.

"We believe this case is backed by a claim to a health insurance company when claims are denied," said Terry. "The jury's verdict delivered the message that the public will not stand for insurance companies putting profits before policyholders."

It is not uncommon for people with cancer to be denied proton beam therapy by insurers, despite the recommendations of their treating physicians. Many radiation oncologists express frustrations about the denials, and websites exist providing tips and recommendations on how to get insurance for proton therapy.

Other cancer patients often turn to sites like GoFundMe to raise money for their treatment. Some insurers eventually agree to cover the treatment of patients after a lengthy appeals process.

Daniel E. Smith, Executive Director of the Alliance for Proton Therapy Access, applauded the verdict and called on insurance agents in all 50 states to make sure that treatment is the best treatment for their patients.

"We applaud Ron Cunningham for standing up to Aetna, and the jury for recognizing and holding Aetna to account for their broken system," Smith said in a statement. "We have seen a similar pattern of betrayal across the industry, where insurers use the information they need to provide information about their patients. "

Some doctors said that one of the most convincing experts was radiation oncologist Dr. Andrew L. Chang, who spoke about proton beam therapy was the best treatment for Orrana Cunningham. He was not involved in her care but was called an independent expert by her attorneys.

"The thing I tried to illustrate is that the proton therapy is not new, experimental technique, like Aetna wants to claim," said Chang. "Proton therapy is a well-established treatment for cancer and has been … Nobody in the oncology community considers proton experimental therapy for the treatment of cancer."

He said that he is one of the most frequently diagnosed patients in the field of cancer for patients with pediatric cancer, typically up to the age of 21.

"One thing we pointed out is that they are more likely to have proton therapy is experimental, they are still caving in it's not experimental for pediatric patients," Chang said. "We point out Medicare country for it for 65 years or older." So, what is it about 22-year-olds to 64-year-olds that makes proton therapy experimental? because they decided to deem it as such. "

Two top cancer specialists, not affiliated with the trial, told CNN they agreed with Chang's assessment.

In Orrana's case, Chang said, the tumor was right next to her brain stem and optic nerve, and it had been growing up towards the base of her skull. He said that this was a standard practice that could have been used, but Aetna wanted, but the "risks were severe."

"She would go blind, she would lose a significant portion of her memory at a cure," Chang said. "For her particular tumor, [proton therapy] was extremely valuable. "

Before Orrana died, he said, scans showed that the tumor was shrinking and the treatment was working.

Aetna attorney Shely told that this was a case of misplaced blame by Mr. Cunningham and his lawyers, according to the official short transcript.

"Aetna has full confidence in your ability to hear the testimony of the witness." "Shely said during his opening statement. "In short, the evidence that you will see and hear will convince you that Aetna has done nothing wrong, nothing."

After considering the evidence, the jury did, in fact, find fault with Aetna's handling of the case, voting on Monday to $ 15.5 million in emotional compensation and on Tuesday tacking $ 10 million in punitive damages.

Kent McGuire, Oklahoma, Oklahoma, The Oklahoma History of Oklahoma. "It was certainly a big deal, it was a message, too," he said.

Ron Cunningham said his wife would be pleased with the verdict.

It was used in the aftermath of the 1995 bombing or after he'd find a child badly injured in a house fire. He'd come home, place his head in her lap and tell her everything on his mind.

"She was a rock for me, especially through my bad times," he said.

The past two weeks at trial, he said, were especially hard because it brought back so many memories. Of her own battle with cancer in 1998, when she stuck by her side. Of her body as she weakened from cancer. Of just missing the gal who stole his heart

Orrana was known to take in stray animals. Cats, dogs, you name it. Ron would tell her he was the biggest stray she ever took in. He laughed while recalling that moment.

He then spoke about the three Aetna medical directors; he said each testified that "they would not change anything they did."

When the jury said Aetna "recklessly disregarded" Orrana's case, Ron Cunningham said, he finally felt justice.

"When they said that, it was like, 'I think we did it proud,'" he said.