[ad_1]
Kellyanne Conway does not think the controversial video CNN White House reporter Jim Acosta refused to drop the microphone at President Trump's press conference last week. The widely criticized clip was simply "accelerated," she said Sunday.
In one meeting with Chris Wallace, host of "Fox News Sunday", known to the White House for inventing the term "alternative facts", was trying to defend the decision of the administration to promote a video. that they were really. The video, which at first glance looks authentic, shows Acosta 's arm descending rapidly on the arm of the young helper trying to take the microphone. The clip is missing for a few seconds and Acosta says, "Excuse me, ma'am," as he holds the microphone firmly and continues to ask Trump questions.
Wallace asked Conway on Sunday what were the White House's reactions to what he described as the now infamous "confrontation" that disrupted Trump's post-intermediate press conference. Wallace made specific reference to the White House press secretary, Sarah Sanders, who tweeted the video "clearly altered to give the impression that it was rather a physical confrontation" and the decision to remove credentials from the White House in Acosta.
[How CNN’s Jim Acosta became the reporter Trump loves to hate]
Asking for clarification on what Wallace meant by "edited, or as others say, quote, a" tampered "video, Conway said it was clear that Acosta" got his hands on [the intern] and caught the microphone back. "
Wallace, who criticized Acosta last week for his "embarrassing" behavior at the press conference, agreed with Conway that the CNN reporter had actually made physical contact with the trainee while both interlocutors were on the microphone. But Wallace continued to press Conway on the fact that experts have confirmed that the clip – which would have been shared first by a contributor to the Infowars plot site – had been changed.
"But by that, do you mean accelerated?" Conway asked in response. "Oh, well that does not change, it's accelerated, they do it all the time in the sport to see if there's a first try or touchdown."
She added, "I do not agree with the exaggerated description of this tampered video as if we were putting someone else's arm on it."
Acosta, she said, should have apologized internally, adding "as far as I know, he did not do it.
Conway's defense of the video caused an instant ridicule on social media, many of them pointing out that speeding up editing is called "editing."
"That's what it means," tweeted author Molly Jong-Fast.
Another Twitter user wrote"Accelerated" literally means "modified to increase speed". So yes, the video has been modified.
Experts who analyzed the clip said the video was accelerated and repeated images did not exist in the original footage, reported The Post's Drew Harwell. The repeated frames, which were only seen when Acosta's arm came into contact with the trainee, seemed to distort and exaggerate his movement, Harwell Shane Raymond, a journalist with Storyful, a global news agency, told reporters. information on social media.
Critics too took the question Conway's confusing claim that sports media are speeding up footage when they need to see close-up plays again. In reality, the opposite is done.
Acceleration of video footage, a Twitter user joked, is only useful for "showing how the seeds germinate".
But there are cases in which sports videos are accelerated. Matt Wilstein, Daily Beast reporter tweeted that the editing technique is handy with the highlight coils.
"It's" accelerated "in the flagship movies to make things more dramatic and violent than they really were," wrote Wilstein.
More from Morning Mix:
Meet Femen, the "naked shock troops of feminism" who welcomed Trump during a barefoot protest in Paris
He allegedly killed his ex-girlfriend because she was dating a black man. But his assassination plot has turned against him, according to police.
[ad_2]
Source link