Kellyanne Conway: The New York Times contradicts the New Yorker's allegations against Kavanaugh



[ad_1]

Jane Mayer and Ronan Farrow of the New Yorker defended their report Monday morning about a second woman accusing Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, Supreme Court candidate, of sexual misconduct, while Kellyanne Conway.

"It's starting to feel like a huge left plot," she said in an interview for "This Morning".

The Times published a report on Kavanaugh's first accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, which included a few paragraphs dealing with the latest accusations of Deborah Ramirez, a classmate of Yale. In his play, he noted that after contacting several dozens of classmates, the Times could find no evidence to support it.

"The Times had interviewed dozens of people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate its story, and could not find anyone with first-hand knowledge," the Times wrote. "Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates to ask them if they remembered the incident and told some of them that they were not there. she could not be sure that Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who was exposed.

Conway said The Times made the remark in the article: "Not because they support the presidential candidate of the Supreme Court, but because they have standards."

In an interview with CNN's "New Day," Farrow said the New Yorkerarticle had corroborating testimony.

Mr. Farrow explained that there were "several stories" from other classmates who had heard of the incident in the days following the party, and one of them. They had the same pattern of facts as Ms. Ramirez, even though he had never spoken to her.

In the New Yorker article, the e-mail distribution chain and two classmates said they supported Ms. Ramirez's claims.

One of these accounts, who wanted to remain anonymous in the print media, heard about it but still claimed that he was "one hundred percent sure" that he had heard that Brett Kavanaugh was involved. The other classmate, Richard Oh, said he heard someone say "in tears" the incident, but he did not know who.

The two men alleged to be at the party, the wife of another man allegedly involved and three other classmates all denied the incident.

"We were the closest to Brett Kavanaugh in his first year at Yale. He was a roommate for some of us and we spent a lot of time with him, including in the dormitory where this incident would have occurred, "they said in a statement to the New Yorker. "Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her stay at Yale. We can say with certainty that if the incident that Debbie claims ever took place, we would have seen or heard about it – and we did not do it.

The wife was also described as a former friend of Ms. Ramirez and said, "She is a woman with whom I am the best friend. We shared intimate details of our lives. And I have never been told this story by her or anyone else. He never came I did not see him I have never heard of that. "

"It's a pretty high level of evidence for this kind of case," said Dr. Farrow. "This goes beyond the evidence base we have used in the past in a number of highly credible cases."

"We have discovered that classmates have been talking about it for weeks and months since July. There had been a chain of emails from Kavanaugh's Yale classmates talking about this thing coming out? – long before Christine Blasey Ford came forward, "said Mayer in her interview on CBS's" This Morning. "

Both Ms. Mayer and Mr. Farrow claim that the eyewitnesses who denied the incident also "sued" Justice Kavanaugh at the time.

"It's not surprising that they do not want to say more," said Mayer.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our comments policy before commenting.

[ad_2]
Source link