[ad_1]
The Buffalo Bills offensive coordinator, Brian Daboll, was named as a genius by running back star LeSean McCoy and a mad scientist by receiver Cam Phillips' training team. You will not hear any phrases about Daboll outside One Bills Drive after a week-long loss to the Baltimore Ravens.
To say that the Bills fought was a euphemism. To the credit of the players, many went out and declared that they did not execute the offensive game plan. However, a member of the Professional Football Hall of Fame was not impressed by the team's concepts against Baltimore.
Kurt Warner watched the Bills game and shared his thoughts on Twitter. The former quarter said that he did not understand what Buffalo was trying to accomplish with some of their pass concepts.
After watching the @ buffalobills O last week – it's no surprise that they struggled … I have no idea what they were trying to achieve on many of their Pass concepts? I'm sure they had their reasons, but I could not understand them!
– Kurt Warner (@ kurt13warner) September 12, 2018
As a result of his tweet, Steven Ruiz, a USA Today For For Win writer, criticized a play in which Allen took a sack in the Ravens' territory.
The last design of the room where Allen took the bag was particularly bad. pic.twitter.com/sfOlTWJrzc
– Steven Ruiz (@theStevenRuiz) September 12, 2018
Warner replied to the tweet and mentioned that the design of the game could have been correct.
"This game design could have been correct – but the details (how to release and attack) were horrible!" Warner tweeted. "They ran to be covered instead of trying to win with leverage … Was that a coach that way or just a bad technician by WR in the game?"
Daboll and the Bills will have a chance to win on Sunday at New Era Field against the Los Angeles Chargers. If the Bills attack looks competent at home in Josh Allen's debut, fans and media members will quickly forget the performance of the team's first week.
Welcome to the league, ride! Members of the media react to Buffalo Bills by naming Josh Allen starter
[ad_2]
Source link
