[ad_1]
IIt looks like Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Is going there.
In fact, she stands by her extremely tenuous claim on Cherokee's Indian heritage, even after receiving a stern reprimand from the Cherokee Nation herself.
I thought she'd already apologized for her disastrous and insulting DNA shot. He was supposed to justify his claim of Native American ancestry. It was supposed to be a ruthless response to the critics she was trying to draw undue minority status when she was teaching at Harvard Law School and the University of Pennsylvania. The test, which she made public Monday with great fanfare, does not prove anything.
It's Friday and it does not seem like an apology is coming soon.
One could think of the era of "cultural appropriation" that a white American senator would be more sensitive to. But you are wrong. In a rather absurd way, the senator even found at least one voluntary supporter in the world of politics and literature to help repel criticism from the Cherokee nation.
"[I]In the words of the Cherokee Nation Declaration, I found that ridiculous. … I also think that the Cherokee Nation's response was problematic because it ignores the fact that DNA testing has always been used to exclude blacks from tribes, "said Zerlina Maxwell, MSNBC contributor and director of the Progressive programming to SiriusXM.
"And so, this story was completely lost in this whole conversation, which is potentially very unfortunate," she added. Ah, so now Warren is black too?
Warren's office also tweeted This week, after critics had rightly noted that his DNA test had raised more questions than answers, he replied, "DNA and family history have nothing to do with affiliation. tribal or citizenship, which is determined solely – and only – by Tribal Nations. I respect the distinction and do not register as aboriginal in the Senate. "
We are all on the same page: Warren's DNA test shows that she is maybe six or ten generations on a link with Native American ancestry, if she has any. This would make it anywhere between 1 / 64th or 1 / 1024th Native American.
The degree to which Warren is deprived of any Cherokee heritage depends on whether his great-great-great-great-great-grandmother was an Amerindian. But the DNA test does not really say. Warren no more. In addition, the study was not based on comparisons with United States DNA in the United States, which makes it doubtful anyway.
Knowing what we know now, Warren often claims that his parents were forced to flee because his father's family opposed his mother's alleged Cherokee and Delaware ancestry … not good. It's a hell of a story to tell a Cherokee Indian at most one in 64.
The Cherokee nation seems to think so.
"The current DNA tests do not even make it possible to determine if a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America," wrote the tribe. "Sovereign Tribal Nations Set Their Own Legal Requirements Regarding Citizenship Even though DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as the paternity of an individual, this does not constitute evidence of tribal affiliation "said Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin Jr. week in a statement.
He added, "Using a DNA test to assert any connection with the Cherokee Nation or with a tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It mocks DNA testing and its legitimate uses, while dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well-documented and whose legacy is proven. Senator Warren undermines tribal interests with his ongoing claims of tribal inheritance.
But remember, it's that ridiculous assertion, it's not Warren's extremely dubious claim to Native American ancestry, at least according to Maxwell.
"The politics of identity is generally clumsy and often trivial, but it's no mean matter: the Cherokee Nation is a distinct sovereign nation, endowed with the rights and dignity that comes with it," writes Kevin Williamson, the National Review. "It deserves to be treated with respect, and should not be used as an accessory by an ambitious low-rent Oklahoma rancher."
The press is talking a lot about Trump's unprecedented brutality. For the most part, the conversation is correct. But I've never seen anything as impudent as a white Massachusetts senator hanging on to a ridiculous assertion of a shared legacy with a marginalized people, even if it does for a reprimand of the same marginalized people. Even Trump has not tried anything like that.
[ad_2]
Source link
