Las Vegas police block the streets near the Mandalay Bay hotel on October 2, 2017, where residents have deposited balloons and flowers in memory of the victims of A mass shot . A lawsuit by MGM Resorts International, owner of the Las Vegas hotel, which Stephen Paddock shot dead 58 people and wounded hundreds, elicits outrage from survivors of the deadliest shooting in the city. 39, history of the United States

. lawsuit filed against hundreds of victims of the rampage on October 1 claims that the entertainment giant has "no responsibility of any kind."

MGM said in a statement that the filing was intended to provide a "quick resolution" or will continue as a result of the attack during Route 91 Harvest Festival. "The unpredictable events of October 1 affected thousands of people in Las Vegas and throughout North America," MGM Resorts spokeswoman Debra DeShong said in a statement. this tragedy, we focused on the recovery of those who are affected by the despicable act of an evil individual. "

More: " There are people shooting everywhere! "

For more information: Documents: Terror, chaos during a murderous murder in Las Vegas

Brian Claypool, survivor of the carnage that represents 75 survivors and the family of victims MGM members described the lawsuit as " maneuver "that will not survive a court challenge.

" I am still in therapy once a week, and that's their way of trying to solve the problem, "he said. liability and downplaying their flagrant negligence. "

Dress Rt Eglet, whose firm represents hundreds of people in the case, dismissed MGM's claim as" scandalous "and accused the company of attempting to To intimidate the victims. Very few of his clients have sued and others will never, he said.

"During my 30 years of practice, it's the most reprehensible behavior I've ever seen a defendant," Mr. Eglet said. "They are trying to victimize these people twice."

MGM's lawsuit claims the case must be tried by a federal court under the Security Act after September 11, which encourages the development and the deployment of anti-terrorism technologies. . The company claims that the security firm it has contracted for the concert, CSC, has been approved by the Department of Homeland Security, thus relieved of its responsibility under the law

Eglet and Claypool have stated that the release does not extend to the hotel. "The Security Act does not apply to them, it applies to the CSC," said Eglet. "MGM has nothing to do with CSC."

Eglet said that there was no reason to classify the lawsuit since the question of jurisdiction is already being discussed in court. He said that MGM is "shopping judge."

"They are trying to find a judge that they like," he said. "All they've done, is causing a lot of stress, pouring gasoline on the fire."

Carl Tobias, a professor at the law faculty of the University of Richmond Virginia, said that with his arguments, but that would have a price.

"Even though MGM is successful, it may not win out on negative publicity for the company that the combination generates, "he told USA TODAY.

MGM took a hit on social media.

"It's just OUTRAGEOUS & WRONG," tweeted JoAnn Smith, whose profile indicates that she is a security guard in Las Vegas. Crypto Contrarian tweeted that "being a Las Vegan, I have to talk about it, does not MGM see how dangerous it will be?"

Paddock fired over 1,000 rounds of a hotel room overlooking the concert. He was found dead from a self-inflicted bullet wound in the room.

Many Las Vegas lawyers present filming on their websites, some calling MGM and the promoter of the concert to ensure insufficient security.

"A gunman bringing more than two dozen firearms into a hotel room, including a military weapons aggression, is almost unthinkable," says Ladah Law Firm on his website. "There are serious questions about security procedures at Mandalay Bay."

The article says, "If you take out a casino chip from a table, you will probably be immediately surrounded by security guards;"

Claypool said that MGM should spend money on Money for security consultants, not lawyers who develop "desperate arguments" to avoid liability.

"Securing safety would be the socially responsible thing to do" he said. "But instead, they offend every person on the planet with their moral indignity."

Autoplay

View thumbnails

View captions

Last slide

Click here to read or share this story: https://usat.ly/ 2LtccWr

[ad_2]
Source link