Mitch McConnell wrote an editorial calling for bipartisanship, and people do not have it



[ad_1]


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky., Speaking to the media at the Capitol in Washington on Wednesday, November 7, 2018. (Photo AP / Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

The date was October 23, 2010 – almost two years after the start of President Obama's first term and two weeks before the first mid-term election of his presidency. The leader of the Senate minority, Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), said in an interview with the National Review: "The most important thing we want to achieve is that President Obama has a president mandate."

Like Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post stressed, reading the quote in its full context clearly shows that McConnell said that it would be impossible for Republicans to achieve their political goals with Obama in power. But the Democrats immediately seized on this remark to prove that the Republicans had done their utmost to obstruct Obama's agenda, putting partisan politics ahead of the country's best interests.

On Tuesday, a week after Democrats regained control of the House of Representatives, McConnell, who is now the leader of the majority, published an editorial for FoxNews.com in a very different note. "Will the Dems work with us or just make partisan politics go before the country?" Asked the title. Needless to say, it did not please the Liberals, who were quick to point out that unmatched chutzpah and blame him for blatant hypocrisy.

McConnell began telling what Republicans had accomplished in the past two years: passing a series of tax cuts, confirming two Supreme Court candidates and overturning federal regulations. "After this prolific race, I was not surprised to be questioned last week about everything the American people can expect from the next Congress under a divided leadership," he wrote. "What can we achieve realistically?"

The good news, McConnell replied, is that "the reports of the death of bipartisanship in Washington have been grossly exaggerated." he noted. Then, in an abrupt tactic, he claimed that the Democrats, having regained control of the House of Representatives, should refrain from investigating President Trump:

The Senate has proven its ability to find bipartisan solutions to the most pressing issues facing our country.

And for the coming year, there will be plenty of opportunities to continue this impressive record of cooperation across the corridor and Capitol Hill.

What we can do with these opportunities will depend on our fellow Democrats. Will they choose to go it alone and simply put forward political arguments? Or will they choose to work together and make a difference?

Last week, the American people made it clear that they preferred Congress to make a difference.

This message may have been lost for some Democrats in the House, who made it clear that they preferred investigations to political results. After years of rhetoric, it is hardly of actuality that some are more interested in fanning the flames of division than beyond the alley.

On Tuesday afternoon, McConnell (or, more likely, a member of his staff) posted a link on the editorial on Twitter. By midnight he had received over 29,000 responses. Almost all of them came from injured liberals, many of whom responded with one name: Merrick Garland, Obama's Supreme Court candidate, whose appointment was blocked by McConnell.

Other answers:

"I hope we work with you in the same way you worked with President Obama. "

"I think every time Mitch McConnell tries to use the word "partisan" a pie should hit him in the face. "

"Dude, you are in my life one of the most followers with zero sum I have never witnessed in politics. It's not something you can be proud of. That's why Congress is so dysfunctional. "

"You excluded the Democrats from all the committees and all the information, so no. Go eat worms."

"Lol seriously ?! How many times have you worked with Dems? How many times have you prevented them from making important decisions when you had the majority or pushed things down your throat? Maybe you should have had this epiphany before now.

"Mr. McConnell, yes, you are the best expert in the world to party over the country. No one has ever made as blatantly as you. But now, you call bipartisanship? Your hypocrisy is staggering. Obviously, no decent American will take you seriously. "

McConnell's office could not be reached to comment on Twitter's reaction late Tuesday night. It should be noted that his feelings, even unpopular online, are not totally out of step with the leaders of the Democratic Party. Last week, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) Promised that Democrats "would strive to achieve bipartisanship" and would seek common ground. with the Republicans – a conciliatory position that has angered some of his constituents.

Pelosi, who is currently aspiring to become the next Speaker of the House, has also avoided any definitive statements regarding possible Trump administration investigations at a press conference held immediately after mid-session. . By informing journalists that the House of Representatives had "a constitutional responsibility for surveillance," she added, she did not anticipate "a scattershot freelance" on that front. Democrats, she said, "are trying to unify our country."

More from Morning Mix:

Blow in the back of the neck at age 17, it's the trauma surgeon who is now leading the doctors against gun violence and the NRA

"Bill Clinton should excuse himself": Monica Lewinsky speaks of a scandal in a new documentary

Can CNN beat the White House in court? Consider the case, 40 years ago, of the solitary journalist named Robert Sherrill.

[ad_2]
Source link