[ad_1]
At the end of last year, Carrollton-based G6 Hospitality LLC, a parent company of 6, admitted that two of its offices in the Phoenix area had voluntarily provided information to ICE, but noted that practice had been implemented at the local level without management.
"When we became aware of it, it was terminated," the company said.
According to the Phoenix New Times, at least 20 unauthorized immigrants were arrested in two Motel 6 between February and August.
By the way, a lawyer said that six Motel 6 establishments in Washington, owned by a company, were providing information on thousands of guests at ICE, according to the New Times.
The practice has subjected the brand to strong criticism from defenders of the right to privacy and immigration.
After the revelation, the US-American Fund for Legal Defense and Education ("MALDEF") and a law firm filed suit in the US District Court of Arizona District on behalf of the eight plaintiffs named in the complaint under the names John and Jane.
The complainants challenged "the alleged policy and / or practice of the defendants as unauthorized disclosure of private information and as discriminatory and unconstitutional discrimination, violation of domestic laws protecting consumers and violation of privacy of defendants ", according to the proposed regulation.
Earlier this year, the company "denied any wrongdoing or violation of the law," said the proposed regulation, but a one-day mediation session resulted in a tentative settlement.
In a recent joint statement, both sides said the proposed agreement would solve the problem.
"In September 2017, when this problem emerged, the company launched an investigation and issued a clear directive to all sites in the country, stressing that this practice was prohibited," the statement said. "Motel 6 fully recognizes the seriousness of the situation and accepts the responsibility of compensating the injured and taking the necessary steps to protect the privacy of our guests.
"As part of this agreement, Motel 6 has put in place additional controls to protect private information and improve law enforcement in cases where law enforcement agencies request information, including when requests are made. lawful are made, "the statement said.
If the agreement was approved by the court, the agreement would also establish a claims process for named claimants and other persons affected by the sharing of information with clients with the authorities of the province. ;immigration.
The pact would remain in effect for at least two years.
[ad_2]
Source link
