[ad_1]
Kyle Busch won at every NASCAR Cup Series circuit.
Where is he?
NASCAR will consider the new Charlotte Motor Speedway road course as a separate track for statistical purposes. This makes sense insofar as NASCAR breaks down its tracks into road courses, short tracks (less than a kilometer), superspeedways (one mile or more) and restriction tracks (Daytona and Talladega, where restriction plates are used).
So, if Busch does not win Sunday (at 2:00 pm Eastern Time, NBC), it will be considered that he did not win on all tracks, even though he did not win. won the Coca-Cola 600 on the 1.5 mile oval CMS.
"I have won there – it's the Charlotte Motor Speedway that I checked out last time, so I have wins at Charlotte Motor Speedway," Busch said.
The decision of NASCAR, although not the most important in the world of stock cars, has certainly sparked a debate on social media.
For example, speaking of the victories of a NASCAR driver in Daytona, some would be ready to add a win to a Rolex 24 sports car to this list, even if it is a question of a race. a different series and on the road.
But not NASCAR. Here's what ESPN experts have to say about this:
NASCAR views Charlotte's road course as a separate oval track for statistical purposes – in other words, it will separate the driver's "Charlotte" statistics into two categories, one for the oval and one for the road. Is this the right approach?
Mike Clay, ESPN: Absolutely. No doubt about it. This is not the same old Charlotte Motor Speedway with a slight tweak to the track; There are two different overlapping tracks. The splitting point of the track is to be able to see how a pilot has made a specific course. Combining oval and roval statistics would lead to erroneous divisions, as they are not even close to the same challenge. Just as if Cup followed the series of trucks and ran to The Dirt Track on the other side of the street, the statistics would not be and should not be combined.
Ricky Craven, ESPN NASCAR Analyst: None of us knows the life expectancy of the roval. It's unique to the NASCAR races and has sparked a huge curiosity among fans and strong opposition from riders and team owners. Regardless of how it emerges, the roval should be completely separate from the Charlotte 600 race and all the other races that existed on the Charlotte Motor Speedway oval. We are talking about apples and oranges here. This concept is successful because the fans will embrace it, and the trend could become a trend for other tracks to incorporate in their second date. I'll go a step further – not only do we have to record all the statistics for this inaugural race separately, but I think we also need to create another category in terms of "track type". We currently have a short track, an intermediate superspeedway and a road course. Make room for the roval.
From beaches and airports to exhibition and rodeo parks, Ryan McGee is one of the rarest facilities to accommodate the biggest stars and their cars.
Pilots can look forward to tightrope walking in Charlotte for the Sunday Cup race, says the veteran pilot who knows one thing at a time about ovals and road courses.
How long is the roval? How many turns are there? Why are drivers worried? What about special rules? And … what is a roval? Here are all your answers and more.
2 related
Ryan McGee, ESPN senior editor: Heck yes that's true. Act as statistics for these two layouts should be the same, even if the name on the door is the same, it's crazy. This is not unprecedented either. The statistics of an IndyCar driver for the early May road race do not match their results in the Indianapolis 500. I have no problem with a place like Darlington, which has changed its layout to over the years (although in small movements). of these statistics on the same sheet of paper. But I know many old school guys, they keep "the old Darlington" and the "new Darlington" in separate categories. But these are just old guys who are old guys. There are no small movements in this modification of the layout.
Marty Smith, ESPN: This is the only approach, although it is the same sport that considers all championships – under multiple determination equations – equal and comparable. I agree with this decision.
Bob Pockrass, ESPN.com: It's the right move. The statistics are meant to tell a story and give an overview. There is nothing like it in both tracks. Some would say that a reconfiguration of the track should then be a new track, but the natural place to make the distinction is when the distance changes significantly or they have to turn right and left. Sorry, Kyle Busch. In order for you to claim a win on every Cup track, you must win this weekend.
Matt Willis, statistics and information on ESPN: Wait, a question about how statistics are ranked? Someone takes care of me. This is 100% the right approach to have separate statistics because the tracks will have little in common, although they use some of the same properties. In the end, we hope that we will have a whole category for quality statistics that will accompany the ovals and traditional road courses. These are different disciplines and deserve to recognize the best performances in this unique racing style.
Source link
