[ad_1]
Whenever commercial speculation begins to revolve around a specific scenario, or a few teams that might seek to make a deal, the conversation usually begins and ends with a cost. If the Los Angeles Lakers could be interested in Bradley Beal, it's pretty simple. They are not sure to send a single element of the new nucleus, and if Washington asks for something else, the negotiations are over before starting.
Eric Pincus of Bleacher Report wrote a very good article on the question of whether the Lakers should consider an exchange for Beal if it costs them Brandon Ingram, and he said that the current situation of the Lakers is quite simple:
Ingram for Beal would be a tough decision for the Lakers. If wizards also ask for Lonzo Ball, Kyle Kuzma and / or Josh Hart, Johnson will certainly pass.
This means that an Ingram-based exchange (and the contracts needed to make it work) for Beal seems unlikely given the opportunity cost of no longer having room for Kevin Durant or any other max player this summer , and also probably the belief of the team that Ingram can still come off.
It is therefore logical that they categorically reject the very idea of adding anything more than value beyond Ingram.
As I have written and repeated a few times, it's the right approach.
Lonzo Ball, Bradley Beal, Kyle Kuzma, LeBron James and JaVale McGee head-to-head with Josh Hart, Rajon Rondo and Tyson Chandler as the team's first backup team are a great team.
Ball, Ingram, Kuzma, Hart, Durant and James are the building blocks of a special team, not only in the sense that they can work collectively on a basketball court, but also in the sense of the elements that the young core can recover in a trade. If we are currently discussing Ingram in exchange for a player of Bradley Beal's stature, the Lakers will still be able to return to this type of agreement later.
It will take patience. As frustrating as the confrontation between Ingram and James has been, the Lakers are still winning more often than they are losing and can still improve. This seems to be the current goal of the organization, and it's the right approach to take right now.
Source link
