[ad_1]
I'll start things this week with a minute of silence for Nathan Peterman, who was eventually cut by the Buffalo Bills in a move that, I think, is assumed by most people, will never happen.
Like any cup in the NFL, there are definitely winners and losers here.
The biggest winner here is probably the one who launched the GoFundMe last week asking Peterman to retire. The second biggest winner here is probably Peterman, since he has to leave the city with about $ 1 million in career earnings plus the $ 359 that the guy from GoFundMe has collected. The third biggest winner here is probably the Bills, mainly because it means that Peterman will no longer play the quarterback for them.
The biggest loser in this situation is me, because it means that my dream of seeing each of Peterman's games bowed in prime time is no longer possible. All I wanted was for all the American football fans to take advantage of Peterman's interceptions, but the bills had to disappear.
Since I can not watch Peterman at prime time every Sunday, I imagine that I will go to Plan B, who watches the advertising below looping 23 hours a day. Cleveland's commercial star, Browns, punishes Britton Colquitt, a talking dog and a little boy who apparently pays for his own electricity bill, which, in my opinion, is all you can find in Cleveland.
I know what you are thinking, and yes, I am creating a GoFundMe right now and I hope we will have enough money raised by February to be able to broadcast this advertisement to the Super Bowl. The game is on CBS this year, so maybe I can get a discount. I mean, probably not, but you have to shoot when you can, a bit like Jared Goff did during the weekend.
The Rams have some of the craziest audibles of the NFL and Sunday, Goff shouted Halle Berry's name in one of the plays, which I'm only talking about now, because BERRY has noted .
The first rule of Twitter basically says that if a beautiful actress tweets you, you must immediately tweet and Goff clearly knows the rules of Twitter because he responded.
Halle Berry is his favorite game!
Earlier this year, Goff had stated that he was also going to try using the Taylor Swift name as his audible sound. Basically, I think he's trying to turn the Rams sound system into a crazy game of Tinder, a celebrity. I mean, the guy did not have a girlfriend as recently as in August and what better way to point out to celebrities than to shout their name on national television.
Enough talk about Goff's infallible dating system with celebrities, let's go for picks.
In fact, before reaching the selections, here's your weekly reminder to check all the selections of all NFL editors on CBSSports.com.
Which teams should you return to the 11th week of the NFL season? And which competitor of the Super Bowl is scary? Now check out SportsLine to see which teams win more than 50% of the simulations, all from the model that outperformed 98% of the experts that NFLPickWatch.com has followed in the past two seasons.
The reason you should click and check out other experts this week is because Jamey Eisenberg took the odds makers in Vegas for the cleaners. Not the cleaners, because it would be weird, but the proverbial cleaners. With his 10th week picks against the gap, Eisenberg went 10-3-1.
Eisenberg's choices against the spread this year are so good that he's actually the country's first medium, with a record of 82-61-5, according to our Pickwatch friends. Basically, if we made all the NFL bets with Jamey 's picks, we would have made a lot of money and we could afford to broadcast Britton Colquitt' s ad in the Super Bowl.
All right, let's move on to the 11th week choices.
Choice of the 11th week of the NFL
Green Bay (4-4-1) to Seattle (4-5)
Thursday at 20:20 ET (NFL network, Fox, stream on fuboTV)
Apparently, one of my main talents in life is to choose the Seahawks games, and I know it because we are entering the 11th week and I always have a perfect balance sheet to choose a game that involves them. I am on a run of nine games and although I do not want to say that I am being shamed at other stages – coughing, Joe DiMaggio – I think we are slowly moving towards this territory. What I learned about Seattle is that if you drink enough Starbucks and look at Anatomy of Gray enough, you will learn all you need to know about the city, which will help you choose games. At least that's what I say to myself.
Although I have not chosen the Packers so well this season, I've noticed in recent weeks two important things that will probably not help them in Seattle: they can not win on the road and they can not win. . can not stop the race. This second problem is going to be a problem because the Seahawks have the best offensive in the NFL while the Packers have yielded 140.6 yards per game on the ground since the sixth week, which is the fifth worst in the NFL over this period.
Green Bay's 0-4 record is also a problem, as the Packers face a Seahawk team that never loses almost at home in prime time, and if I learned one thing about the selection of Seahawks games, it's that you never choose them. at home in prime time (14-2 years since the hiring of Pete Carroll).
By the way, when I said that choosing the Seahawks matches was one of my talents, I would like you to know that I have others. Jenga, hypnotizing babies and being able to name all the Hallmark Christmas movies that have been made are some of the other things I'm good at. That being said, choosing the Seahawks games is without a doubt the talent I am most proud of. I will not have anything I can be proud of if I'm wrong, so hopefully I will not blow it up.
The choice: Seahawks 26-23 on the Packers
The result: Seahawks 27, Packers 24
Cincinnati (5-4) to Baltimore (4-5)
1 pm ET (CBS)
If you like drama, and who does not like it, then this should be your favorite game of week 11. This game has many secondary intrigues, it's basically a football version of The love actually. Between these two teams, we have a coach who could possibly be dismissed at the end of the season, a possible controversy regarding the back quarters and a team that has just sacked his defensive coordinator.
For the Ravens, I do not know who will start the quarterback in this game and that's mainly because Joe Flacco was injured at the hip. To be honest, I'm not sure that the hip injury makes sense, because I'm 40% sure that even if he did not have a hip injury, the Ravens would always think of supporting him for the benefit of Lamar Jackson. Basically, the Bengals will either face a Flacco or a quarterback who will make their first career start (Jackson), which means that this choice of game should be easy, except that the Bengals may have the worst defense of the NFL. l & # 39; history.
If you are potentially the worst of any NFL history, it's hard to choose your team to win.
In addition, the Bengals have their own drama. On the one hand, they fired their defensive coordinator Monday. After making this decision, they decided that the best way to solve their problems was to recruit Hue Jackson. And yes, it's the same Hue Jackson who has just been fired for scoring 3-36-1 in the last two and a half years with the Browns. If the Bengals plan was to engage Jackson, ask him to develop a game plan and then do the opposite of this game plan, then this decision makes sense. Otherwise, it looks like an impending disaster.
The last time Hue was in Cincinnati, he was the offensive coordinator (2014-2015), which could complicate the task of the current offensive coordinator (Bill Lazor), especially if the Bengals have a hard time being offended in the coming weeks. . Hue will probably make some suggestions and assume no responsibility in case of any problem (if we learn one thing about Jackson during his media tour "I just got fired, it 's that' s right. he will throw anyone under the bus for anything).
The good news for the Bengals is that I do not think anyone will be thrown under the bus this week because Cincinnati will win.
The choice: Bengals 23-20 on the Ravens
Minnesota (5-3-1) to Chicago (6-3)
20:20 ET (NBC, streaming on fuboTV)
I do not know at all who is responsible for the flexible games in the NFL, but they must hate the Bears because it's the only way to explain the fact that this game has been moved to a great time. listening. Although most teams love the idea of moving to Sunday night, I guess the Bears hated it and that is mainly because they have to turn around and argue the match of the beginning of the Thanksgiving season.
Of course, it was perhaps just the way the NFL leveled the playing field in the North of the NFC because the Bears were UNSTOPPABLE THIS YEAR. Well, mostly unstoppable. Although they are 6-3, I am pretty sure that they should probably be 8-1. Two of their three defeats were absolutely crazy: they lost in Aaron Rodgers' wild comeback in Week 1, and in overtime to their arch-nemesis Brock Osweiler, who is 3-0 in career against them. .
Basically, I think what I mean here is that the Bears could be the third best team in the NFC (behind the Rams and Saints). When the season started, I was not very high on the Bears for two reasons: 1. Because these are the Bears and 2. Because I have not been sold on Mitchell Trubisky. The number one problem solved itself when the Bears traded their shares against Khalil Mack and problem number two has slowly been resolved over the past 10 weeks. Trubisky was getting better each week.
The bears are now who I thought they were.
This clip will never age.
This match marks the first time in six years that the Bears are hosting a Sunday night game at home and if I have one rule regarding the choice of Sunday night games, it is that you never choose against a team when they host the match for the first time since 2012.
The choice: Bear 30-20 on the Vikings
Kansas City (9-1) at L.A. Rams (9-1)
Monday at 8:15 pm ET (ESPN)
Apparently, someone forgot to tell the people of Mexico that they were supposed to host an NFL game this week, because I do not think anyone cared for the ground at the Azteca stadium. I mean, I could be wrong, but I do not know how else to explain the terrain conditions shown in the photo below, taken at some point last week.
The field looks like a 48-hour rave where everyone got tequila, but instead of drinking it, they spread it on the ground and set it on fire so that the field would have been cleared. completely charred air. Now, I'm pretty sure that's not what happened, but I will not rule it out.
In addition to the horrible condition of the field, another thing that could have come into play in this game was altitude. Mexico City is 200 meters above sea level, which is rather paradoxical, as 7,400 could represent the number of points scored in this match. The Chiefs are the second-highest scoring team in the NFL averaging 35.3 points per game and the Rams are no less ranked, placing third at 33.5 points per game.
In fact, these teams score so often that the NFL must not use a clock for this game and give the victory to the first team that scores 50 points. It would be a lot more exciting, and to justify his decision, the NFL could simply make it the all-time rule for every game in Mexico. These two teams are about equal, but I'm going to give the Chiefs a slight advantage, because the Rams offensive will have to play without Cooper Kupp, who tore his ACL in the 10th week.
I have a perfect record in choosing the Rams games this year and I will put it into play by choosing the Chiefs. If you like, do not let me down in Kansas City.
The choice: Heads 40-37 on the Rams
UPDATE: The NFL has decided to bail out Mexico City and move the game to Los Angeles. However, I will not bail out my pick. I stay with the chefs.
Choice of the 11th week of the NFL: everything else
Falcons 24-20 against Cowboys
Panthers 27-17 on the Lions
Colts 27-24 on the Titans
Buccaneers 30-27 against the giants
Texans 22-19 on Redskins
Steelers 30-23 on the Jaguars
Cardinals 19-16 against the Raiders
Chargers 31-20 on the Broncos
Saints 34-24 against the Eagles
BYES: Bills, Browns, Dolphins, Patriots, Jets, 49ers
Last week
Best choice: Last week, I predicts the saints would win double digits in Cincinnati, then the Saints would come out and win double digits in Cincinnati. I watched all four quarters of this game and I can say unequivocally that it was the second biggest defeat of November, ranking only behind the beat of Alec Baldwin, gave this guy that was trying to take his parking spot in New York. Oh, and he also ranks behind Sean Payton handed over to a fire alarm at Paul Brown Stadium before Sunday's match.
This fire alarm never had any chance. Normally, I would say that violence never solves anything, but it could solve everything because I bet Baldwin will no longer have any problem finding a parking spot in New York and that Payton has destroyed a fire alarm inspired his team to score 51 points. Maybe Marvin Lewis needs to start destroying fire alarms.
Worst choice: I've made bad choices in my life (most of these happened after midnight while I was in college), but I must say that choosing Lions to beat the Bears last week could have been the worst of all. By the 10th week, the Lions were on a losing streak and had just dropped TEN SACKS in a game. For whatever reason, I thought that they were going to magically solve all their problems and win a game on the road in Chicago. . I was the only writer from CBS Sports to have chosen the Lions to win this game and, judging by his reaction on Twitter, I would have perhaps also been the only person on the Internet to take the Lions .
This insult is hard, but right.
Nathaniel also had a friendly request.
He would like me to apologize to everyone for choosing Lions. To be honest, Nathaniel, if anyone needs to apologize this week, these are the Soldier Field amounts and they have to apologize to Cody Parkey.
If anyone did not see what was going on, Parkey missed four kicks against the Lions and they all missed the match after bouncing back on a turnaround. It was so unlikely that I have the impression that Jared Goff and Halle Berry have a better chance of getting married than seeing a kicker hitting a pole four times in a game.
The odd part here is that I think the Chicago champions are now leading the NFL in blocked goals.
Finally, if you've ever wondered which teams I'm really good at choosing, this is the part where I tell you, but you already know it since I mentioned it all the time this week. After 10 weeks, I'm always perfect to choose two teams: Rams (10-0) and Seahawks (9-0). Also, I am 8-1 choose the chargers.
On a related note, you should basically just ignore my Eagles choices. I am 2-7 to choose them this season, which means that they will probably beat the Saints by 10.
Record of choice
Directly at the 10th week: 8-6
Global SU: 96-50-2
Against the spread of week 10: 6-7-1
TTY in general: 70-73-5
Exact score forecast: 2
You can find John Breech on Facebook or Twitter and If he does not do any of these things, he is probably trying to raise money for his Britton Colquitt GoFundMe campaign.
[ad_2]
Source link
