[ad_1]
Russia target
We now know for sure that Vladimir Putin sent two assassins to inflict Novichok on Great Britain. The civilized world must wake up to the deadly regime of the Kremlin.
The man whom President Macron has shamefully faced in the World Cup final is a psychopathic tyrant who hastens sneaky killers armed with weapons of war.
And how did this gangster state react yesterday to being exposed? Sneering at Theresa May's dance.
Russia faces stiffer sanctions. The international community must demand that suspects be put on trial.
Britain must repel Putin's espionage network and his oligarchs who launder their dirty money in London.
The Sun congratulates our intelligence services and the police for their diligence and ability to identify these murderers. Some 11,000 hours of video surveillance were screened.
But where does all this leave comrade Cob? Six months ago, Corbyn, informed by his Trotskyist lackey, Seumas Milne, spoke of Putin's course of action. Even yesterday, with hard evidence before him, he still could not condemn the Russian regime.
Imagine – with one murdered and three hit by Novichok – if the useful idiot of the Kremlin had been our prime minister.
Holy evil
OUR LEFT The archbishop of Canterbury has a revolutionary idea: to tax the rich! How on earth did he think about that?
Justin Welby is of course right to point out the plight of low wages. But his solutions are the norm of lazy work, ignoring the inconvenient facts:
Inequality has been declining for years. The richest 1% pay 27% of the income tax, compared to only 11% in the 1970s. Increase the highest rates of networks LESS money since the richest find ways to avoid it or to leave.
Low corporate taxation is partly responsible for the incredible creation of jobs since 2010. Reverse the trend and see the queues grow.
And an avalanche of taxes on wealth will not bring equality. The overall burden is the highest in 30 years. Raising it further will kill aspirations, investments and jobs.
To help the poor, CUT their taxes instead.
Dessert storm
We do not discount the Treasury's fears of jobs that may be at risk if we make sure that restaurants put calories on their menu.
Food applications can evaluate the calories of a dish in a matter of moments. A menu is a work of a few hours from time to time.
Better than imposing more state-nanny taxes on crowbar customers than they like. It is much more likely to persuade them to choose a healthier option.
The problem is to enforce it. We do not want "calorie policemen" to give companies trouble. But someone needs to check that the numbers are correct. What looks like a paperwork recipe.
It's a decent idea. . . If the government makes it as painless as possible.
[ad_2]Source link