Officials have responded badly to Myles Garrett's call



[ad_1]

The NBA provides a so-called last-minute report that analyzes the last moments of the games and often indicates arbitration errors made at critical moments.

The NFL does not have it. What he has is the NFL vice president to referee Al Riveron using NFL Network to call his officials.

Riveron: Myles Garrett did not brutalize Ben Roethlisberger

Riveron did so on Monday and admitted that Cleveland Browns defensive end Myles Garrett should not have faced Ben Roethlisberger in a crucial third game in the red zone on Sunday 21-21 against Pittsburgh Steelers.

On the play, Garrett put pressure on Roethlisberger and hit him shortly after he released the ball on an incomplete pass. Officials said Garrett had been mistreated, saying he was putting his weight on Roethlisberger while driving him to the ground, which would be a rough draft.

The NFL has attempted to explain how officials should analyze whether Myles Garrett uses some or all of her body weight on a tackle. (Getty)

Riveron: Garrett used it, not "most, if not all" of his weight

Riveron told NFL Network that Garrett did not put enough weight on Roethlisberger and should not have been reported.

"The rule specifically says" most, if not all, of your body weight, "Riveron said," so we want that player to make an effort, and in the last three or four weeks we've shot a full video to show the clubs exactly what we're talking about, and last week we probably showed five to one or six contact numbers, because the question we're asking ourselves all the time is this: what do you want our players to do? ?

"Well, they do not have to put weight on the quarterback. And this one showed yesterday, even if there is weight on Ben, this is not what we consider as a contact at the level of a fault. "

The Steelers then scored a touchdown on the disc. In a match at 21-21, this is the kind of call that can legitimately be called a game changer.

Legislating Violence in the NFL is an often confusing task

Riveron's call and critics in this regard testify to the challenge faced by NFL players and officials.

The standard set by a player to decide in the heat of the action, when he puts "the maximum, if not all" of his weight on a quarter when tackling in real time, is absurd. As absurd as it is to ask the officials to determine whether the player put "as much or as little as possible" of his weight on a player during a tackle, then said that the official was mistaken the next day taking advantage of the idle recovery and time. think about it.

Although this incident is not an example of the new helmet rule that has led to massive confusion during the pre-season – the rule of body weight has been in effect for years – it's in the same neighborhood .

The NFL is continually trying to legislate the nuances of violence in an inherently violent game, which often makes the game confusing and frustrating for players, officials and fans alike.

Although the ultimate goal is player safety, chaos – not player protection – is often the end result.

<p class = "canvas-atom-canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – smt Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Subscribe to the Yahoo Sports NFL podcast
Apple Podcasts • Stitcher • Google Podcasts"data-reactid =" 43 ">Subscribe to the Yahoo Sports NFL podcast
Apple Podcasts • Stitcher • Google Podcasts

<p class = "canvas-atom-canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – smt Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "More from Yahoo Sports:
• Charles Robinson: why Dallas could have a big offensive problem
• Baldwin, other big NFL stars suffer brutal injuries during the first week
• Star was not supposed to start, but Browns messed up
• NFL winners and losers: Jimmy G. finally takes a 'L'
"data-reactid =" 46 ">More from Yahoo Sports:
• Charles Robinson: why Dallas could have a big offensive problem
• Baldwin, other big NFL stars suffer brutal injuries during the first week
• Star was not supposed to start, but Browns messed up
• NFL winners and losers: Jimmy G. finally takes a 'L'

[ad_2]
Source link