[ad_1]
In the fast food sector, where you find beef, you can very well find antibiotics.
A new report attributes "failures" to 22 of the 25 largest US hamburger chains because of their policy regarding the use of antibiotics in beef production. ;they serve. The report was co-authored by researchers from various public interest organizations, including the US PIRG, Consumer Reports, and the Natural Resources Defense Council, among others.
Only two companies analyzed – Shake Shack
SHAK, -0.54%
and BurgerFi – were rated "A". Both companies serve only high beef without antibiotics. Only Shake Shack and Wendy's have released independent third-party audit reports on the use of antibiotics by their producers.
"The results of this morning's fourth annual 2018 chain reaction report did not surprise us," said Corey Winograd, CEO of BurgerFi, in an email to MarketWatch. "We are known for providing a completely natural hamburger experience and we will continue our commitment to a quality diet that ensures the absence of steroids, antibiotics, growth hormones, chemicals or food. additives. "
Wendy's
MAGNIFYING GLASS, -0.34%
received a "D-" because she started buying 15% of her beef this year from producers who reduced their use of the antibiotic tylosin. (MarketWatch contacted the other 24 companies for comments, but did not receive immediate feedback.)
The following companies, however, received unfavorable ratings:
- McDonalds
MCD + 2.01%
- Burger King
QSR -0.94%
- Sonic
HIS C, -0.09%
- Jack in the box
JACK, -0.55%
- White castle
- Hardee's and Carl's Jr.
- Five guys
- Whataburger
- Burger In-N-Out
- Steak 'N' Shake
- Ladies and Rallies
- Krystal
- Smashburger
JFC + 1.73%
- Freddy's Steakburgers
- L & # 39; habit
Habt, -0.70%
- Fuddruckers
LUB, + 2.75%
- A & W
- Jack & # 39; s
- Farmers boys
The researchers ranked the companies according to their policy regarding antibiotics in beef, their implementation and their degree of transparency regarding the use of antibiotics in the meat served. Most of these companies received failures largely because they had not responded to a survey sent by the researchers and had no stated antibiotic policy. on their website.
Some of these companies have publicly announced their intention to make improvements with regard to antibiotics. A spokesman for McDonald's told MarketWatch that the company is no longer supplying medically important antibiotics to chicken and is finalizing a similar policy for beef, which should be implemented by the end of 2018. "Preserving the effectiveness of McDonald's antibiotics is of great importance for future generations," the spokesman said.
Read more: Your child's happy meal is probably not a healthy meal
Similarly, In-N-Out said in 2016 its intention to procure high beef without medically important antibiotics, but the researchers said it "has not yet acted on a commitment limited in time nor provided an update on its progress.
The findings of the report show the striking contrast between the fast food industry's approaches to antibiotics in beef and antibiotics in poultry. According to researchers, more than half of the 25 largest fast food chains and fast casual restaurants have policies in place to eliminate or limit antibiotics in the production of meat and poultry that they serve. . On this scorecard, only 8 channels failed, an improvement over 11 companies last year.
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are becoming more commonplace and research has linked their importance to the use of antibiotics in livestock. Although the use of antibiotics is necessary in livestock breeding to prevent animals from contracting the disease, improper practices can promote drug resistance and increase the risk of death in the home. man of foodborne diseases.
Get a daily summary of key personal finance readings in your inbox. Subscribe to MarketWatch's free newsletter, Personal Finance Daily. Register here.
Source link
