Reliable sources: The Washington Post reacts to the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi


[ad_1]

Jamal Khashoggi disappeared on Tuesday after entering the Saudi Arabian consulate in Istanbul. His colleagues at The Washington Post, where he has been working for a year, were becoming more and more concerned. And last Saturday, the worst news possible: Turkish officials, according to anonymous sources, said that they had concluded that Khashoggi had been killed at the consulate.

The Turkish government did not allege this on the record. And the officials did not provide any evidence. Saudi Arabia has "vehemently denied any involvement in the disappearance of Khashoggi," according to CNN's latest report. "A Saudi official said that Khashoggi had left the consulate shortly after his visit, but the Saudis have not released any video surveillance or other evidence."

"The whole world is watching"

That's what Karen Attiah, the editor of Khashoggi's post, wanted to convey. Attiah joined me on Sunday in "Reliable Sources".

"We want to hope that he is still alive and with us, and that he will be able to come back to us and be safe," she said.

But if this news is true, if he was murdered at the consulate, it's devastating, she said. "It's an attack on us also at the Washington Post."

Attiah said, "We're all watching what's going on with this investigation, and we're not going to let that go."

At this point, more than 24 hours have passed since reports without any evidence of death, but without any evidence of life …

He just wanted to write

Khashoggi is one of the best known journalists in Saudi Arabia. In the past, he was also "very close to the Saudi family," said Attiah.

But then, under pressure from the government, his Al-Hayat column was canceled. Then, he said, the government banned him from Twitter. He stayed silent for six months … And then he started writing for the Post. He said that Saudi Arabia was not only "repressive", but downright "unbearable".

"I think it's very important to know" that he "did not want to be known as a dissident," said Attiah. "He did not want to be that opposition character." When he wrote his first article for us in 2017, in September, he said, "It changed my life. I just want to be a journalist. I just want to write. ""

Reply from WaPo

"We will not rest until we know what happened to Jamal Khashoggi," Jason Rezaian's video title for the Post's website. His message is all the more powerful as he was detained in Iran for 18 months.
Here is what the editorial board of the post office said Sunday evening: "It is a horrible crime, the murder of a journalist in the consulate of his country on foreign soil – something unprecedented in the modern era ".
David Ignatius also published a compelling chronicle about Khashoggi and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman …
And Liz Sly has this profile of Khashoggi in the print edition of Monday … Read it here …
>> BTW: La Poste has dropped its paywall on some of Jamal's work … to encourage people to read his works …
>> Latest Robin Wright for the New Yorker: "The last time I spoke to Jamal Khashoggi in August, he was worried about his life …"

Waiting for a word from the US government …

When information about Khashoggi's murder was first published, a spokesman for the State Department said, "We are not able to confirm this information, but we are following the situation closely. " Since then, there has been no comment …

CPJ Chief: "We need answers"

The Executive Director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, Joel Simon, tells me: "What is alleged about the murder of Jamal Khashoggi is almost too terrible to be considered." The media reports are all based on anonymous sources, such as as you know, but they are more and more specific, we need answers from the Saudi and Turkish authorities, and after cherishing the Saudis, the United States must insist that the government be clear. "

Simon adds: "I hope against hope that what has been reported is not true.But if Jamal Khassoggi was lured into a Saudi consulate and then murdered, it would be a truly depraved act and one the most heinous crimes I've ever seen in Twenty Years of Freedom Fight, it's time for anyone who knows anything to come forward. "

Meghan McCain back to "The View"

Five weeks after her father's funeral, Meghan McCain returns to "The View" Monday morning …

Calendar of the upcoming media week

Monday evening: Opening of the summit of the new VF establishments in Los Angeles. I will lead a meeting on Tuesday …

Tuesday after the closing of the market: Trunk returns to Tribune Publishing …

Tuesday night: POTUS is organizing the first of four campaign rallies this week …

Wednesday: the FOLIO conference continues in New York. I will speak during this session hosted by Erik Wemple …
Wednesday night: The Daily Beast marks its tenth anniversary with a party in New York …

Friday: Newsgeist starts in Phoenix …

FOR THE RECORD

– Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey writing about a year ago since #MeToo: "It may be time to think of it less as a report than as a new permanent element of our lives …" (NYT)
– How much attention will this title attract? The banner of CNN.com headlined Sunday night: "The Earth has until 2030 to stop catastrophic climate change, warn experts …" (CNN)

Taylor's Endorsements

Normally, I shrugged if a celebrity on the list of nominees came to endorse some Democratic candidates. But Taylor Swift is different. She remained on the political edge … to the point of becoming a typing line … but now she is expressing herself. This could be a big problem.

Hats off to CNN's Sandra Gonzalez for this lead: "Mid-way, look what you did to Taylor Swift." On Sunday night, via an Instagram post, she approved Tennessee Democrats Phil Bredesen and Jim Cooper.

"In the past, I've been reluctant to publicly express my political views," said Swift, "but because of many events in my life and the world over the past two years, I feel very differently about subject now ". She has 112 million followers on Instagram …

SWIFT SAYS HIS FANS: "Please, please, find out about the candidates in your country and vote according to who best represents your values ​​…"

BREDESEN DIT: "I am honored to have your support …"

THE TWITTERATI SAYS: This is Taylor v. Kanye …

History in the making

On CNN, Dana Bash described it as the "deadliest battle" in the history of the Supreme Court. The battle ended Saturday afternoon with the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh. The Republicans applauded while the Democrats mocked … And the scars of this battle will stay with us all for a long time.

"These things always end up stopping," Mitch McConnell told a reporter on Saturday. This has led me to make the easiest prediction I have ever made about cable news: it will not "pass".

Have journalists lowered their standards?

On Sunday, in "Reliable Sources", I asked my panelists if the media looked better or worse at the end of the confirmation battle. (Worse, no?)
Frank Sesno said that he was generally in agreement with Sara Fagen, who said the other day on MSNBC that "20 years ago, no major publication of any kind". information would have even published the second allegation ", namely the interview of Deborah Ramirez in The New Yorker. Watch our full conversation here …

Victory on the right, fury on the left

Brian Lowry emails: A theme common to the progressive circles of the weekend – exposed simultaneously on Friday night by Lawrence O Donnell and Bill Maher during their respective shows, and in a Philip Bump play for WaPo – is what O Donnell called a "design flaw" in the Constitution, allowing Senators representing a minority of the population to confirm Kavanaugh. Ditto for the electoral college, which allowed two presidents who lost the popular vote to appoint several judges of the Supreme Court. Whatever one thinks of the argument, the short-term question, as all three have recognized, is how to go beyond lamenting this situation and find a way to to standardize the rules of the game in the existing system …
Read more about Sunday's Reliable Sources newsletter … And subscribe here to receive future editions in your inbox …

Go back …

Christine Blasey Ford predicted this result. I tried to report it Sunday "Reliable". According to WaPo's first article on Ford, she decided at the end of August NOT to show up, "calculating that it would upset her life and probably not affect Kavanaugh's confirmation".

Well, she was right … But then her name was leaked and she decided to express herself on her own terms …

[ad_2]Source link