Review of Venom Review: Critics tear apart Spider-Man split



[ad_1]

Where does Eddie Brock end and where does Venom start?

This is the central issue of Columbia Pictures & # 39; Venom, in theaters Friday. Located in the Spider Man universe, the film follows the journalist Eddie Brock (Tom Hardy) as he tries to defeat Carlton Drake (Rice Ahmed), the infamous founder of the Secret Life Foundation. Eddie's obsession of exposing Carlton ruins his career, not to mention his relationship with his girlfriend Anne Weying (Michelle Williams). But after receiving a tip from one of the Life Foundation employees, Dr. Skirth (Jenny Slate), Eddie's investigation takes another turn when he encounters an extraterrestrial symbiote who merges with his body and gives him super powers. While the transformation is terrifying, Eddie also finds his newborn abilities intoxicating. But Venom is dark and unpredictable, which is bad news for Eddie, as it endangers the people around him. And to defeat Carlton – and especially as he mingles with Venom – Eddie must simultaneously fight his violent impulses while surrendering to the inner monster.

Ruben Fleischer directed the film, from a script of Kelly Marcel, Jeff Pinkner and Scott Rosenberg. Venom is rated PG-13 for the language and for the sequences of violence and action of science fiction. Based on Marvel comics, Scott Mist, Ron Cephas Jones and Reid Scott complete the casting.

(Be sure to look at the post-credit scene to see who is supervising Cletus Kasady.)

This is what critics say Venom:

• Of course, the "always interesting" Hardy has a "distracting New Yawk palooka accent and a nervous boaster", but Venom "It's like being in a second-ranked Marvel player called prematurely to big players" Weekly entertainment& # 39; s Chris Nashawaty written. To his credit, Venom is "elegantly dark." However, it's also "mediocre, and therefore forgettable." She stays sort of there, beating you, senseless, not knowing if she wants to be a cartoon movie or putting the whole idea of ​​cartoon movies in his sights, he never goes higher than expected and busy. "

• The brand image Venom "irremediable" and "without imagination" The Hollywood journalist& # 39; s Todd McCarthy "Despite the guaranteed profits from any Marvel-branded film, those involved should think about the truth of the photo's advertising slogan:" The world has enough superheroes. " Venom "It sounds like a step back," and not in a good way: "The writing and making of movies are completely bland, the film looks like an imitator, an aspiring, not a reality." In the end, it reads like "by the pound, with no fun or surprise, except for Stan LeeLast minute cameo more extended than usual. "

• "Realized with a flat competence and without joy" Venom "feels like a pretty weak poison" compared to other films in the Marvel film universe, according to The Los Angeles Times& # 39; Justin Chang. But for a film "conceived as a liberating celebration of evil, it's probably not as bad as it should be," he adds. Hardy "makes good company" and the actors "score their accounts and earn their salary with the utmost professionalism, even if they have little conviction or energy." Ultimately, Venom never lives to the "wickedness" of his principle, he writes. "This is a case in which a story that should have been incredibly dark seems to be hampered, if not purified, by its PG-13 rating, as well as by the usual imperatives of the Hollywood franchise."

• "Aggressively loud and stupid without being very amusing at all" Venom "It's a waste of time for some very talented actors, and that's the proof that even Marvel (whether it's the studio or other films based on his imprint) does not always succeed as it should " Alonso Duralde written. "Hardy" always fascinates, even when the material is less, but in Venom He finally found a project that he can not overcome by his talent alone. "Williams' role is essentially limited, while Ahmed and Slate" give what could be their first bad performances, respectively over-played and shy. "

• call Venom "spectacular but mainly derived and traced generically" Variety& # 39; s Owen Gleiberman "It could have been a fun creation, but the movie spends too much time looking at it … originally." Despite Hardy's best efforts, "Venom there is no character study; it's a fantasy of awesome numbers of awesomeness treated. Eddie is supposed to be Clark Kent at the age of activism, but in reality, the film must give him something to do before his great transformation. "Although the graphics" can be dazzling " Venom "This is a classic case of comics film whose skill, and even the bravery of visual effects, are exhilarating."

Do you plan to see Venom in theaters? Sound off in the comments.

[ad_2]
Source link