Scally Report's incredibly informative & # 39; – President of the IMO



[ad_1]

The president of the Irish Medical Organization said that reading the Scally report on the CervicalCheck crisis had been "incredibly informative".

Speaking on RTÉ this week, Dr. Peadar Gilligan congratulated Dr. Scally and his team and said the report clarifies "a lot of problems".

He said the report reconfirmed the importance of the CervicalCheck service and the audit of the screening program.

He said the time must now be set aside to explain the details of "the undesirable event" that has occurred.

The inability of physicians to disclose information to patients was a central element of the report and, when they revealed, some doctors were accused of being insensitive, hurtful and even misogynistic.

In response, Dr. Gilligan said, "It is clear that things were said during the consultation, in my opinion, on reflection, these doctors probably would not have said or would have proposed a very different way" .

"I think it's very important in the context of disclosure that the proper resources are put in place and that, therefore, the time has to be set aside to explain the detail of the adverse event that it's produced ".


Read more:
The exploratory investigation on the CervicalCheck screening program

The 50 recommendations of the Scally Review


The Scally Review was released Sept. 12 and revealed "serious gaps" in the expertise and governance of the CervicalCheck screening program.

Presenting his report, Dr. Scally said that the problems uncovered "suggest a failure of the entire system".

The exploratory investigation into the CervicalCheck screening program was set up to examine the non-disclosure of information to patienst and the seemingly widespread practice of non-disclosure, and who knew that this was happening.

The controversy was revealed after Vicky Phelan, of Annacotty, Co Limerick, and her husband, Jim Phelan, sued the Health Service Executive and Clinical Pathology Laboratories Inc., in Austin, Texas. in the American laboratory.

A cancer was diagnosed three years after the 2011 smear test results were incorrectly reported as abnormal.

By the time she had another smear test in 2014, she had cervical cancer.

Since then, it has emerged that more than 200 women with cervical cancer should have received treatment sooner.

[ad_2]
Source link