[ad_1]
What does it really mean to be brain dead? The case of Jahi McMath has sparked a debate since she was pronounced dead five years ago but continued to live with the help of machines. ()
Jahi McMath, the teenager from Oakland who was at the center of a controversial debate, was removed from the machines that kept her alive for five years.
Why the
The Life and Death of Jahi McMath
Jahi McMath passed away on June 22, nearly five years after being declared dead by doctors at the UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital of # 39; Oakland. According to family representatives, the machines that kept McMath alive were removed as she suffered from liver failure and excessive bleeding as a result of an operation to treat an intestinal problem.
The McMath trial began in 2013 routine procedure to remove his tonsils resulted in irreversible brain damage and doctors declared his brain dead. Several specialists were in agreement with the statement after various tests, but his family did not believe that the 13-year-old was already dead and believed that she should be treated the same way as any other person who has suffered a brain injury. 19659003] Courtesy of the Alameda County Superior Court, McMath was taken to a New Jersey facility, the only state that allows families to reject brain death claims for religious reasons. Once there, McMath spent some time in the hospital before being transferred to a house where she spent the next few years feeding and breathing.
In the years that followed, McMath continued to grow, to experience puberty, and to celebrate his birthdays. Her family even posted videos of her moving her foot or hands in response to her mother's commands, as well as MRI results that showed McMath had regained some brain activity.
'Effect Jahi McMath & # 39;
The case of McMath and his family opened the conversation about parental rights, as well as the accuracy of the determination of brain death. Eventually, McMath's story caused the "Jahi McMath effect" where families later rejected the deadly diagnoses of their loved ones.
In the medical community, however, many felt that the McMath tests were determinants of irreversible loss. brain function. Apart from Dr. Alan Shewmon of the University of California at Los Angeles, who reviewed nearly 50 videos of McMath and determined that she was not eligible for brain death.
In a Viewpoint article published in JAMA Robert D. Truog of the Center for Bioethics at Harvard Medical School describes McMath's case as raising doubts about the determination of brain death in Canada. United States.
"Cases like Jahi McMath's cause great anxiety. they seem to cast doubt on the ability of the medical profession to distinguish between the living and the dead, "said Truog.
30 Gadgets and Gifts for Father's Day 2018 What Dad Will Think of Being Rad 19659016] © 2018 Tech Times, All rights reserved Do not reproduce without permission
[ad_2]
Source link