[ad_1]
The so-called fetal burial law, which has recently been debated in several states of the country, marked the next chapter in the fight against abortion in Texas and could fuel the national legal struggle against the right to l & # 39; abortion. , the case passes in front of the courts of appeal.
"Make no mistake, these restrictions were designed to shame and stigmatize patients and health care providers," said Amy Hagstrom Miller, president and CEO of Whole Woman's Health, which runs clinics abortion in Texas. – remains the case as well as the case decided by the Supreme Court in 2016. "This decision reaffirms that Texan women are fully capable of making their own medical decisions regarding their family, their future and reproductive health care."
In the past, Texas law had treated fetal tissue as a type of human waste called pathological waste. Health care facilities could dispose of these tissues in a variety of ways, including grinding and discharging them into a sewer system, incinerating them, and disposing of them. The 2017 law required health care facilities providing care to pregnant women to remove fetal remains be buried, incinerated, incinerated, then buried or steamed, and then buried.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose office defended the law in court, said in a statement that the law was intended to prevent health facilities from disposing of fetal waste in sewers or landfills. Mr. Paxton and other supporters of the law have termed "human disposition of fetal remains". Opponents said it aimed to shame women in search of abortion and to increase the barriers, costs and bureaucracy faced by abortion providers.
Mr. Paxton suggested that Texas appeal Judge Ezra's decision.
"Today's decision is disappointing, but I remain convinced that the courts will eventually respect the Texas law, which respects the dignity of unborn children and prevents fetal residues from being treated as medical waste," he said. Mr. Paxton.
Source link
