The angler's method of fishing with the release of water prevents the fish from feeding properly, a study reveals



[ad_1]

Hook-and-mouth wounds can prevent fish from eating well, according to a new study.

The results will be alarming for fishermen who consider their hobby not only safe for fish, but also a way to conserve endangered species.

Capture and release methods are common in recreational fishing, and individuals often use barbless hooks to reduce damage to their targets.

However, new research by a team of Californian scientists has added to a growing body of evidence that even practices that are considered humane may have unintended consequences.

When a fish is hooked by the mouth and the hook is then removed, it leaves a sore that can disrupt the suction feeding system used by many popular target species such as trout and carp.

According to Professor Tim Higham of the University of California at Riverside, the principle is quite simple.

"The suction feeding system is a bit similar to the way we drink liquid with a straw," he said.

"If you make a hole in the side of your straw, it will not work properly."

The debate over whether fishing has been harming fish has been going on for years, usually with animal cruelty activists on one side and amateurs on the other.

As far as science is concerned, it was far from clear. Neurobiologists have often claimed that fish do not have the ability to feel the pain as we imagined, but some experiments have suggested the opposite.

But the new study undertaken by Professor Higham and his colleagues, and published in The journal of experimental biology, do not attempt to answer this question. Instead, it's simply a question of mechanics.

Aspiration feeding is based on the creation of negative pressure in the animal's mouth, which sucks prey, and scientists have wondered if this would change after being pierced by a hook.

To investigate, they studied the effect of different fishing methods on 20 small minnows fished near the Bamfield Marine Science Center in Canada.

Ten of these fish were caught using nets and ten using a hook and a line.

After catching the fish, the scientists immediately took them to the laboratory. Once there, they donated fish food and used cameras placed in tanks to monitor their feeding performance.

All the fish also seemed eager to eat the food they were given, but those who had been caught with hooks seemed to have trouble doing so.

"As we had predicted, fish with mouth sores exhibited a reduction in the rate at which they were able to attract prey into their mouths," said Professor Higham.

"That was the case even though we used barbless hooks, which are less damaging than barbed hooks."

The fish were safely returned to the water after the experiments.

"This study points out that snagging is not as simple as removing the hook and that everything is fine, but that it is rather a complex process that should to be studied in more detail, "said Professor Higham.

He pointed out that these experiments alone did not make it possible to determine the extent to which angling affected the feeding performance of these fish in the wild. However, while they wait for their mouths to heal, he said that it was likely that their ability to feed themselves would be affected.

[ad_2]
Source link