[ad_1]
(Reuters) – A US judge on Friday denied the Trump administration to impose conditions on public safety grants to further crackdown on illegal immigration, and he ordered that the Grant money is unblocked in the "sanctuary cities" of California.
However, while Judge William Orrick of San Francisco concluded that the conditions imposed last year on public safety subsidies granted by US Attorney General Jeff Sessions were unconstitutional, he maintained a national injunction pending the appeal.
The US Department of Justice declined to comment.
The conditions for granting the subsidy required recipients to provide immigration and customs control officers with access to prisons and prisons, to inform detainees of their release and to certify information was shared with the federal authorities.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra filed a lawsuit against the administration in August 2017. The state argued that subjecting the $ 28 million of federal funds to a condition would be detrimental to law enforcement and deter police co-operation of immigrants, a large population of the state.
In the United States, many jurisdictions have adopted some form of "shrine city" policy, which generally prohibits cooperation with immigration officers. US President Donald Trump had made the removal of illegal immigrants an essential campaign commitment and he often criticized sanctuary cities.
Chicago, Philadelphia, and Los Angeles have successfully sued the Trump administration on the terms of the public security funds, known as the Byrne Memorial Justice Grant, and these cases are pending appeal. .
The use of national injunctions by US district courts has been a major impediment to many Trump policies, and appeals in sanctuary city cases can provide a means for the administration to limit their use by local authorities. lower courts.
Tom Hals report to Wilmington, Delaware; edited by Bill Berkrot
Source link
