The "economic" approach of packers with T.J. Lang was intelligent



[ad_1]

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "A year and a half ago, the Packers watched as a long-time departure guard T.J. Lang went away to a rival of the division, the Lions, taking more money in Detroit than Green Bay was willing to pay. At the time, the Packers were criticized for this gesture. This criticism was false. "Data-reactid =" 18 "> A year and a half ago, the Packers saw the guard go from long ago T.J. Lang headed for a division rival, the Lions, taking more money in Detroit than Green Bay was willing to pay. At the time, the Packers were criticized for this gesture. This criticism was false.

The Lions placed Lang in the casualty pool today, ending his second consecutive season in Detroit. Lang signed a $ 28.5 million three-year contract with the Lions, but it was announced that the Lions would release him in the off season instead of paying him the $ 9 million he was supposed to earn in 2019. Lang's deal now looks like an expensive Detroit mistake.

And refusing to respect this contract now seems a wise decision on the part of the Packers general manager at the time, Ted Thompson. It was particularly cautious for Thompson because he knew he would have to stand the criticism of his move: the Packers coaching staff would have been "scandalized" by the fact that Thompson had refused to overtake the Lions' offer, instead letting go Lang. Thompson has been criticized for being too "cheap" to keep Lang.

But as PFT wrote at the time, the NFL has a strict salary cap and the "cheap" move of a person is the enlightened management of the cap. Thompson was also concerned that Lang's age and history of injury put him at risk of being unavailable for the long term. These concerns have proven to be justified.

So, when a dear player moves from one team to another free, it's not as simple as saying that the team that lost the player gets worse, and that the team that hired the player improves. In Lang 's case, it' s the Packers who were the better off when a rival of the division spent a lot of money on a player than the Green Bay home office did. was waiting to see a decline.

[ad_2]
Source link