[ad_1]
The news of a new royal baby made us think of baby names. (Photo: Linda Kloosterhof, Getty Images / iStockphoto)
Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan & # 39; s The news they expect of a child in the spring reminded us of baby names.
We think the royal baby will have a historically royal name, like Victoria or Arthur. At least, that's what bets already made with British bookmakers theorize.
But Harry and Meghan have the gift of breaking with tradition, so that their firstborn could very well have an unusual name. They could even be inspired from his home country.
PHOTOS: The fairytale romance of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
We know the most popular first names in America – they have not changed much in the last 10 years. The boys had Liam, Noah and William in the top 5 names since 2007. The girls had Emma, Olivia and Ava since 2008.
Then, as we are at the bottom of the name rabbit hole, we wondered what were the least popular names. So we used the Social Security Administration's data to find the names of the least popular boys and girls since 2007. Of the top 1,000 names by number of births, they arrived last.
Less popular boy names
- 2017 – Jaxx
- 2016– Bode
- 2015 – Jayvion
- 2014 – Reagan
- 2013 – Graeme
- 2012 – Kamdyn
- 2011 – Kamren
- 2010 – Keshawn
- 2009 – Trevin
- 2008 – Carlo
- 2007 – Leroy
Less popular girls' names
- 2017 – Alora
- 2016 – Kensington
- 2015 – Sidney
- 2014 – Cambria
- 2013 – Kaelynn
- 2012 – Sofie
- 2011 – Damaris
- 2010 – Karley
- 2009 – Gretchen
- 2008 – Diya
- 2007 – Kya
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, arrived in Sydney on Monday just hours before Kensington Palace announced that the royal couple were expecting a child in the spring. Outside Buckingham Palace, tourists wished them good luck. (October 15)
AP
READ MORE:
Read or share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/allthemoms/2018/10/18/least-popular-baby-names-over-last-10-years/1672901002/
Source link
