The shoulder of Andrew Luck does not bother him anymore – Indianapolis Colts Blog



[ad_1]

INDIANAPOLIS – It is officially time to stop questioning Andrew Luck. And more importantly, it's time to stop questioning the right shoulder surgically repaired by the Indianapolis Colts quarterback.

The questions do not need to come today, tomorrow, next week or next month.

Luck proved that Sunday afternoon, silencing all detractors worried about his ability to throw the ball with any zip and distance. He brought the clock back to his days before the injury by scoring for a career-high 464 yards and four touchdowns in a 37-34 loss to the Texans.

"You put too much on him," receiver T.Y. Hilton said. "He is fine."

Andrew Luck looked like his former self Sunday, throwing 464 yards against the Texans. Bobby Ellis / Getty Images

Luck's performance would have been the title – no coach Frank Reich's decision to qualify for the fourth in overtime – the Colts had found a way to come from behind to beat the Texans. It also happened after Luck and Reich spent last week answering questions on the shoulder of the quarterback after he was removed from play for a Hail Mary in the final game of the third week's defeat facing the Eagles.

Throwing for a career in yards with a franchise record in attempts (62) and tie the franchise in the final (40) does not mean that Luck is a quarterback who has problems throwing the ball. He had 319 yards or more in two of the first four games of the season. Therefore, Luck's shoulder and sustainability are not at the top of the Colts' list of concerns.

"Sometimes it was the best I've felt for a long time," Luck said. "I do not want to compare with what happened in the past, but [were] times we did very good things. We need to find a way when we start with a big reader, relying on [it]. "

This is the chance for you. He refuses to focus on him. For him, it is the entire list to the final player. The only time Luck spoke to himself, is when he blamed receiver Chester Rogers for the wrong pitch in the fourth failed attempt in overtime.

Luck beat Sunday's numbers without his original striker Anthony Castonzo, right-winger Joe Haeg, the anime favorite Jack Doyle and had to finish the comeback after Hilton left the game in the fourth quarter due to a hamstring injury.

He missed the chance, which resulted in quick throws and even throws while being touched, as he faced the constant strain of the Houston duo, JJ. Watt and Jadeveon Clowney.

"It was a long match – 60 delays are a lot," Luck said. "I think what we did in the first part of the game – awesome, I can not ask for better conduct, and then, in a way, the comedy of the mistakes that everyone else was part of, and that's all. is not what you want to do against this team: three rushers of elite.

All you need this week:
Scores, highlights and more »
• Full calendar »| Full ranking »
• weekly leading statistics
• Injury tracker: who's in, out
More NFL coverage »

"I'm particularly proud of our offensive line and our guys for their presence.It's easy to slip his tail between his legs and sit down and tell the coach that we can not go past him." We must have protection from eight men They did not do it.They went back up each time and fought until the bitter end. "

All that Luck did to make up for the loss of these players was to do what he did early in his career when he looked like one of the future NFL stars: Spread the ball.

Eight different players had at least 17 passing yards and the chance yards would have been higher without a few drops. Rogers and the rookie run With 11 goals, Nyheim Hines was tied for the team and rookie Zach Pascal went from a return to 10 goals and a touchdown. This is a vintage Luck for you, a quarter capable of getting the most out of what he has.

The Colts will need more luck from Luck – probably in fewer passing attempts – as it does not appear that he will have Hilton against New England because of a hamstring injury. hamstrings. Doyle is still injured in the hip.

But as Hilton said, Luck is "in agreement".

Sunday was another proof of that.

[ad_2]
Source link