[ad_1]
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stop a lawsuit filed by young activists who claimed the government was not doing enough to prevent climate change. The High Court, however, told the Trump administration that the government could always ask a lower court to dismiss the case as it had asked the High Court.
The trial was scheduled to begin earlier this week in Eugene, Oregon, but the Supreme Court temporarily suspended the trial earlier this month. Friday night, the High Court refused to temporarily suspend the trial. The court stated in an unspecified three-page order that, ordinarily, the request made by the government to the judges for the case to be filed must be addressed to a lower court first. The High Court has stated that "adequate redress may be available" from the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. This court has previously refused requests for filing the file at an earlier stage.
The Supreme Court also did not rule out referring the case to the judges after the court of appeal rendered its decision. Judges Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch stated that they would have extended the stay of the proceedings.
Julia Olson, one of the young women lawyers who brought the case, said in a statement Friday night that she had asked for the immediate convening of a status conference so that the "police" and the "police officers" had been arrested. deal "be back on track for next week's trial".
The lawsuits against the government were brought by 21 young people between the ages of 11 and 22, who claim that government officials have known for more than 50 years that carbon pollution from fossil fuels was at the root of climate change. and that oil and gas policies deprived them of life. , freedom and property.
Young people also say that the government has failed to protect natural resources as "public trust" for future generations. The lawsuit says that a court orders the government to take action to quickly eliminate carbon dioxide emissions to a certain level by 2100 and to develop a national climate recovery plan.
The federal government under the Obama and Trump administrations has repeatedly tried to obtain the rejection of its record since filing in 2015, but without success so far. Trump administration lawyers argued that the trial was an attempt to "re-direct federal environmental and energy policies through the courts rather than the political process, by asserting a new and unsupported fair trial right based on certain weather conditions". Kerri Kupec, spokesperson for the Justice Department, declined to comment on the Supreme Court's action Friday.
Watch the special election coverage live on CBSN on fuboTV. Start a free trial
© 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, disseminated, rewritten or redistributed.
[ad_2]Source link
