[ad_1]
It's like we're back in the spring of 2017: the impending staff reshuffles! The chef de cabinet can be outside! The White House is in chaos. Nobody can control Donald Trump!
And again, those around Trump are fleeing like crazy.
But a bit of perspective here: presidents usually wave their teams after the mid-term elections – especially the losers – and some officials naturally decide that it's time to move on.
With the exception of the dismissal of Jeff Sessions – Matt Whitaker – his temporary replacement anti-Mueller, being controversial, I do not know why the press must deal with every rumor of a Cabinet or White House change like the coming of the apocalypse.
But the planned staffing changes turn into a broader narrative of the edgy president scathing and reversing some of his duties while his staff is steaming, according to reports in the Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and Politico.
There is no doubt that Trump has appeared more aggressive and more aggrieved since the Democrats seized the House (their number is now 33 seats). Even Melania took part in the reshuffle action.
Insiders tell me that the president is unhappy, disappointed by some of the best people and ready to make changes. In my opinion, he also made mistakes in the process.
But does this add to the portrait of an uncontrollable leader?
When the Washington Post quoted historian Doug Brinkley as saying "there is only one bull carrying his own porcelain store with him", is this bull the same?
The newspaper piece titled "Five Days of Fury" goes from Trump's simple appeal to Theresa May to the cancellation of a planned memory of the First World War in a cemetery in France. "Trump was quickly infuriated by a torrent of tweets and media coverage suggesting that the president was afraid of the rain and did not respect the veterans …" Trump considered a personal attack. "
It also goes from Trump's Twitter messages on "FRAUD" during the Florida elections to Jim Acosta's revocation of power to the president, telling CNN reporter Abby Phillip that she was asking "stupid questions".
The Los Angeles Times has a similar story about a "dark" Trump: "The president has criticized several collaborators, ranging from beginner press assistants to senior officials." He is furious, "said an official of the administration.
Politico, like the other outlets, discusses possible staff movements, focuses on "enmity en bloc" and on "a new round of gossip" among the staff.
The president told other people that he wanted to overthrow Kirstjen Nielsen, the chief of homeland security, which was obvious since he accused her of border problems.
And it says once again that he suspects the departure of John Kelly (in favor of Nick Ayers, Mike Pence's senior associate). We constantly discussed Kelly about Kelly, who seemed to be over when the president announced that he would stay until 2020. So it's not clear if this is going to fail.
But then came what is really a weird show. Melania Trump spoke to Mira Ricardel, Assistant National Security Advisor, with this public statement: "The office of the First Lady has the position to no longer have the honor of serving in the White House . " (The Wall Street Journal reported that Ricardel was gone, then retracted it, and the situation is not clear.)
Many first women, including Nancy Reagan and Hillary Clinton, clearly had a strong influence on their husbands and fired staff. But making a statement goes beyond the unusual, which suggests that Melania was trying to do privately what she did not manage to do behind the scenes.
So it's a tumultuous time for the president, no doubt. But keep in mind that those who broadcast all these anecdotes to journalists can have their own agenda.
Source link
