Total madness? Nomination of Moonmoon for moons of moons proves discordant – RT World News



[ad_1]

Astronomers believe that it is possible for moons to have their own mini-moon – but the scientific suggestion that they should be called "Moonmoons" is not going very well among those who have a more poetic inclination.

READ MORE: NASA administrator presents historic spaceship … makes Lego

The term "moonmoons" began with astrophysicist Duncan Forgan, ScienceAlert reports, who wrote an article awaiting publication on the subject.

More recently, astronomers Juna Kollmeier and Sean Raymond have written their own article describing how Moonmoons might be possible. However, they opted for a name a little less ridiculous, but just as disappointing, of "submoon".

Twitter users in particular are very unhappy with the missed opportunity to name something that is technically not even a thing yet, but that could very well be confirmed as a thing to do. to come up.

Although "Moonmoons" is not the agreed term for this speculative phenomenon (we assume that this honor belongs to the person who actually finds a concrete example), this did not prevent the Australian House of Representatives from throwing in the shade the suggestion.

READ MORE: The very first 'exomoon' discovered a planet orbiting our solar system – study

Another planetary astronomer, Michele Bannister of Queens University Belfast, told New Scientist that she would rather choose a "moonmoonlet" to be more precise.

"I think we can say with certainty that there is not a moon moon that is miles away around Jupiter or Saturn. A moon can reach the size of a skyscraper, but I would call it moonmoonlet, "she explained.

You think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

[ad_2]
Source link