[ad_1]
With Hillary Clinton already part of the scrum midway, the entry of Barack Obama last Friday shows that the group returns again. Until now, the music is irrelevant.
Clinton, as usual, is all about money. Its latest fund, Operation Together, sent an e-mail to donors by sending them a "Resist" sticker if they sent it $ 5. I was able to resist the offer.
Obama, meanwhile, delivered his first campaign speech since he left the White House and his media maids immediately flipped over like stupid teens.
Twitter has promoted it as a "free speech", which is only accurate if you think Obama is an honest politician. The Twitter bias shows up again.
It is true that there were smart lines and sharp on the division of Trump, but to appreciate them, it was necessary to forget the eight years of Obama in the oval office. People without amnesia will remember that the polls revealed that Americans thought that the nation was more divided at its departure than at the beginning, including on racial grounds.
The bitter tone of Obama's supporters on Friday, with his typical Republican mockery, contrasted with the bipartisan odes at Sen. John McCain's funeral. Too bad that Obama was not there. . . Oh, wait, he was there.
Not surprisingly, he seemed bitter about how the country is evolving without him. He still did not understand that in 2016, America was not buying what it was selling.
While campaigning for Clinton at the time, he said it would be a "personal insult" if youth and non-whites did not come in large numbers. That they could not explain why much of his speech was a reprimand about the vote.
But as someone has said about empty sports stadiums, you can not force people to go to the game if they do not want it.
Inadvertently, Obama had some funny lines, like when he claimed credit for the stimulating economy. He also demanded "a restoration of honesty and decency and legality in our government". Even Hillary must have betrayed this idea.
Count Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) among the unimpressed.
"The more former President Obama talks about the" good years "of his presidency, the more likely President Trump will be re-elected," he tweeted.
Trump said he had fallen asleep during Obama's speech, but now that Obama and Clinton are active again, the president should wake up to take advantage of the target they are presenting.
If this is the case, he will finally begin to publish records of efforts by the Obama White House, the FBI, the Department of Justice, the State Department and the CIA to assist Clinton and the United States. stop in 2016.
The misconduct already revealed at the highest levels of the FBI is a historic scandal – and it almost certainly is the tip of the iceberg.
There is every reason to believe that there is compelling evidence that would implicate many Obama administration officials, including power players John Brennan, Susan Rice and James Clapper.
But this evidence remains hidden because Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein will not abandon him. A handful of congressional Republicans were diligent in trying to convince the mother, but President Paul Ryan did little to help and they were stuck.
Trump himself was strangely serene, limiting himself to tweets instead of using his power to declassify documents and make them public. However, he promised The Daily Caller last week that his team was "very seriously" looking for decommissioned documents that the FBI and Justice have submitted to the courts of FISA for a spying warrant on Carter Page he two years ago.
Many issues are at stake with these documents alone, the most important of which is whether officials misled the judges about the information they had to justify using the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to spy on a US citizen.
Based on public evidence so far, it is likely that officials had little, if anything, more than the unverified Russian record on Trump, secretly funded by Clinton through a law firm . The FISA documents will also likely reveal whether the judges knew that their British author, Christopher Steele, stated that he was determined that Trump would not be elected and that the FBI had hired and then fired Steele for lying. .
A number of readers have written to say that they believed that Trump was waiting for the fall campaign to warm up before publishing the documents. If they are right, the time is near.
But publishing documents is not just a campaign problem. It is fundamentally about transparency and protection against excessive secrecy that includes too much of what the government does on behalf of the governed. The secret is particularly irritating when it is used to protect reprehensible acts or a simple discomfort.
Trump could even make common cause with Senator Spartacus. Also known as Cory Booker, the New Jersey Dem led a Senate uprising following the publication of documents related to the work of the White House of Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court candidate under President George W. Bush .
Until now, the documents that Senator Spartacus and the other Dems have published in their Exceptional Scheme do not undermine the path of Kavanaugh's confirmation, but this only underscores the value of transparency. He exposes the truth on all occasions.
As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said, "sunlight is considered the best disinfectant".
If all Americans are to agree, it is because our government needs a lot more sun.
Krugman's cracked crystal ball
Just when you think the New York Times has bottomed out, columnist Paul Krugman proves he can go lower.
"Kavanaugh Will Kill the Constitution," said the headline on his Friday column, a tribalism speech, stolen court seats and the end of all that is dear to people like him.
Alas, predictions are not Krugman's forte. Although he is an economist, he insisted that the stock markets would never get over the Trump election and that GDP growth of 3% was out of reach.
The constitution is safe.
A quota under another name …
The first victory of any argument goes to those who define the conditions. Thanks to this measure, the mayor wins the first round in its attempt to impose racial quotas in public schools.
Most people regard quotas as odious and probably unconstitutional, which is why officials do not use this term. The mayor of Blasio and Chancellor Richard Carranza are calling their plan "desegregation", which deceives many good New Yorkers into believing that they are doing something noble.
They are not. They only divide the seats according to race and skin color, regardless of merit, as they believe that too many white and Asian students are admitted to the best schools.
It's a fact. Everything else is fiction.
The "violent" rhetoric
Title: "Attacks on ICE and border patrol increase as illegal immigrants become more violent"
Hmmm. I wonder if the rise of violence comes from some politicians who call the ICE agents "thugs" and other vile things.
Source link
