[ad_1]
"The dilemma – which (Trump) does not fully understand – is that many senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from the inside to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations," reads the Times newspaper. "I would know, I am one of them."
The Times stated that disclosure of the grievor's name, which is known from the publication, would compromise the grievor's work, and stated that publishing the book anonymously was the only way to provide readers with an important perspective.
Trump dismissed the editorial as "really a shame" and "inconsistent", criticizing the author and the New York Times for publishing an anonymous opinion piece.
"We have someone in what I call the failing New York Times who talks about his involvement in the resistance within the Trump administration," Trump said. "That's what we have to face, and you know the dishonest media … but it's really a shame."
Trump assailed the anonymous article referred to as "bottomless editorial".
He then focused on his achievements, saying that "no one has done what the administration has done to get things done and get things done."
The editorial provides a first-hand account that corroborates the key themes of a damning new book on Trump's presidency by veteran journalist Bob Woodward: that some of the president's key advisers have a vision of the commander in Chief and work quietly to thwart the most reckless and impulsive decisions of Trump to become a reality.
The author writes that the resistance inside the Trump administration is not the same "resistance" of the left against Trump and said he and his like-minded colleagues are working to thwart some of Trump's actions "want the administration to succeed … the duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a way that harms the health of our republic."
"That's why many Trump appointees are committed to doing what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while counteracting Mr. Trump's more mistaken impulses until he does not." not in post. "
The result, according to the official, has been a "two-way presidency" in which Trump's worldview – expressed both in public and in private – differs from some key actions taken by the administration, such as those involving additional sanctions against Russia.
A dramatic alternative to the unobtrusive effort to thwart some of Trump's more troubling actions was however considered, the official said: invoking the 25th amendment.
The official alleges that there were "early rumors" in Trump's cabinet of invoking the 25th amendment, which would force a majority of government members to declare in Congress that they thought that the president was unable to
Explaining the "resistance" efforts, the senior administration official offers an overwhelming portrait of Trump's character and leadership ability.
The author claims that "the root of the problem lies in the amorality of the president" and assails Trump's "rash decisions", his "erratic behavior" and what he describes as the leadership style "impetuous, contradictory, insignificant and ineffective" Trump.
"The origin of the problem lies in the amorality of the president, and anyone who works with him knows that he is not attached to any of the first discernible principles that guide his decision-making," he wrote. official. "Although he was elected Republican, the president shows little affinity for the ideals long defended by conservatives: free spirits, free markets and free people."
The senior administration officer offered detailed information on the unqualified ideas of a senior official, but the drafting was in line with reports made during Trump's presidency. In these reports, many senior administration officials described Trump's impulsive decision-making and the chaos that often animated the president's inner circle.
This is both a confirmation of the portrait of the president painted by Woodward and reporters covering the Trump administration, as well as an attempt at reassurance.
"It can be a comfort in this chaotic period, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room, we fully recognize what is happening, and we try to do what is right even if Donald Trump will not do it. " . "This is not the work of the so-called deep state.It is the work of the stable state."
CORRECTION: This story has been corrected to reflect the author of the play who is a senior administration official.
[ad_2]Source link
