[ad_1]
Adult actress Stormy Daniels signs an autograph in Berlin on October 12th. (Kamil Zihnioglu / EPA-EFE)
Philip Bump
A national correspondent is largely focused on the numbers behind the policy
The story of Stormy Daniels is simple. In 2006, she met Donald Trump at a golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, before inviting him to dinner. This one was in his hotel room. Things have progressed. In 2011, also before the policy, Daniels told his story to InTouch magazine, which sat there – apparently because Michael Cohen, Trump's personal attorney at the time, threatened to sue.
As election day approaches, in 2016, Daniels spoke to various media about his alleged affair with Trump. Someone from the National Enquirer got wind of it and Cohen ended up paying $ 130,000 to Daniels to remain silent about his allegation. Cohen, speaking under oath in federal court this year, says Trump was aware and directed payment to Daniels. His story was buried until the beginning of this year.
On Monday, a court dropped the lawsuit brought by Daniels following the publication of his story. She had sued the president for defamation after calling his charges of being approached by someone to remain silent about the so-called Trump affair. "a total scam. "
On Tuesday, Trump responded as we could expect.
Why should we expect Trump to take off the appearance of Daniels (beyond the quaintness of saying that a so-called former romantic partner looks like a farm animal)? He did it often before. He decried the look of Carly Fiorina when he faced her during the Republican presidential primary. He denigrated the appearance of one of the women who accused him of having sexually assaulted her. Over time, he has so decried so many women that the first question he had in the first Republican primary debate was centered on these comments. The question came from journalist Megyn Kelly; Trump then attacked Kelly several times on Twitter.
Trump's willingness to hit his opponents is something his fans often applaud. A Republican base that has passed the administration of Barack Obama to watch the conservative media chastise the elected officials for not having fought the Democrats enough has embraced a candidate who had watched the same media and who was ready to give the coup de grace, that it is justified or not. A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center earlier this year revealed that those who appreciate Trump appreciate him for his approach to work and his personality rather than his policies.
And, of course, some conservative media and personalities praised Trump's response to Daniels.
The Daily Caller, in a tweet, called the new nickname "devastating". The site has created a special graphic to share on social networks.
The Washington Free Beacon called the tweet "celebration." The creator of "Dilbert" and fervent defender of Trump, Scott Adams Free three emoji crying with laughter.
Bill Mitchell, a prominent Trump supporter and radio host, has been praised.
Mitchell too tweeted that he would honestly honestly take in my president charming lies every day.
The daily call is apparently against another tweet, removing the image of a Halloween horse mask.
Ari Fleischer, former George W. Bush press officer, was less enthusiastic, Speaking on Fox News.
"It's there that the president is his worst enemy," Fleischer said. "He does not need to call anyone. You do not do it when you are president. . . . The president can fight so hard that he strikes himself often.
Fleischer compared the tweet to MBC Brzezinski's infamous smear on MSNBC by MSNBC last year. Trump called it "low IQ Crazy Mika" and said that she had been introduced to her area of Mar-a-Lago for the New Year's Eve "bleeding profusely from a facelift ". YouGov surveyed all Trump tweets; The Brzezinski series were two of the three lowest-rated tweets from the Trump presidency.
The former Bush press officer is not necessarily the one who reflects the attitude of the Trump base, of course. There is nothing to suggest that Trump's willingness to refer to a woman who credibly alleges an extramarital affair under the name "Horseface" will cause concern among many of her ardent supporters.
However, one wonders how an electorate who thinks Trump is detrimental to women in an electoral cycle that already aligns with the women who run for office and defies the status quo – partly in response to Trump's presidency – will react to Trump again disparaging a woman for her appearance.
[ad_2]
Source link
