Trump's migrant family, poorly planned, say feds

Since then, the General Inspectorate of the State of the United States, the General Inspectorate of the State of the United States, has been trying to understand what it was wrong with the ill-fated, now-reversed family separation policy.

"DHS was not fully prepared to implement the Zero Tolerance Policy, or to deal with certain effects of the following policy implementation," write the report's authors.

The Inspector General review was first reported by The Washington Post.

Homeland Security spokeswoman Katie Waldman said the report says "difficulties in enforcing immigration laws that are broken and poorly written." But it says that it will always be the case that there is no need for cross-border prosecution – the central component of the "zero tolerance" policy – and that the department is committed to ensuring that "there are consequences for illegal actions."

According to the General Inspector report, maintaining that immigration enforcement posture will require widespread exchange across the department.

Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, President of the United States, said: "Previously, most undocumented immigrants caught crossing the border are placed in civil deportation proceedings, often released in the US and ordered to appear before an immigration judge. Under the new policy, all of them would be referred for criminal prosecution and most would be detained until their court hearing.

At the same time, the federal law and the court can not be held in detention centers. That combination of the government to begin with separating families.

The report identified problems from the start. Minors are presumed to be in the United States of America and the United States. But in at least 821 cases, they were held for longer periods of time.

In the department's Rio Grande Valley area, the busiest along the southwest border, 44 percent of children were held by the 72-hour limit. In the El Paso sector, 40 percent of children have been held past the limit.

"The number of children held for these purposes," read the report, citing limitations in the data received from CBP officials.

The difficulties only remain as a result of deportation proceedings.

The report found that agents misled parents about the fate, and the location, of their children. The report describes the plight of one father at a Border Patrol facility that was taken to court and told that his 5-year-old daughter would be waiting for him when he returned. When he arrived in short, he was given a flyer explaining that he would be separated. He was not returned to the Border Patrol facility.

"Instead, he was placed on an immigration and detention facility," the report read.

Once separated, the report found that families had many difficulties trying to communicate with each other. In some facilities, parents had no idea that they could make a call to find their child. In Port Isabel, staff placed flyers to HHS to locate their child. But the flyer "HHS toll-free number."

The parents of the parents and the parents of the parents and the children of the family are the parents of the family.

Health and Human Services Border Patrol databases, but not with CBP's Office of Field Operations. The administration announced on June 23 that Homeland Security and Health and Human Services had created a "central database" containing information for both parents and children.

"However, OIG found no evidence that such a database exists," the report read. "DHS has since acknowledged to the OIG that there is no direct electronic interface between DHS and HHS tracking system."

Due to the lack of accounting, the reporting of breaches of the law, the reporting of breaches of the law, or the reporting of breaches of the law, or other adverse effects.

The report points out that the government "may have been able to avoid separating some families" if they had made some minor logistical changes. A USA TODAY review of criminal prosecutions under the "zero tolerance" policy showed that most parents were sentenced to a certain amount of money.

The Inspector General report came to the same conclusion, and found that most parents were then taken to ICE prisons instead of being returned to the CBP facility they were being housed in with their child. The reason?

"According to a senior official who has been involved with this decision, CBP made this change in order to avoid the additional paperwork required to readmit the adults," the report found.

The government is in the final stages of reuniting more than 2,500 children who are separated from their parents. U.S. Judge District Dana Sabraw, who ordered the meetings on June 26, has been overseeing the case. Some parents will get a second chance to apply for asylum, and they will be deported.

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2018/10/02/trumps-migrant-family-separation-policy-poorly-planned-say-feds/1497127002/