[ad_1]
Rick Santorum, the Republican presidential candidate who has failed twice and is no stranger to controversy, has again sparked outrage on the internet Sunday – this time for tampering with a conspiracy theory about climatologists of the government.
Democratic lawmakers have condemned the administration of President Donald Trump for publishing a federal report on climate change on Black Friday, saying the timing was meant to bury his alarming conclusions and warnings. But Santorum hailed the gesture of the administration.
"Good for them," said Santorum as part of CNN's "State of the Union" program, thereby arousing the disbelief of his colleagues and host Dana Bash.
"All right, at least you're transparent about it -" Bash replied, perhaps referring to Republicans, climate change skeptics or both.
Santorum interrupted, "Well, it's a report generated by members of the bureaucracy. These are not named by Trump. "
According to NASA, at least 97% of climate scientists believe that global warming over the past 100 years is "extremely likely" because of human activities.
Santorum, citing no evidence, said the federal government scientists were "money-motivated" when they warned in their report that the planet was preparing for catastrophic climate change – perhaps even irreversible.
"I think what Donald Trump says is true, namely: look, if there was no climate change, a lot of scientists would be looking for work," Santorum said. "The reality is that many of these scientists are motivated by the money they receive."
Santorum's comments generated a quick reaction on Twitter, calling again for CNN to drop him as a paid commentator. The former senator from Pennsylvania has been repeatedly disregarded in recent years for his comments on the show, including his call to high school students to learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation rather than enforce more laws. firearms in the aftermath of shootings in schools.
"By continuing to employ Rick Santorum, @CNN seriously undermines their credibility," wrote a Twitter user. "[Santorum] says his personal conclusion [is] that climatologists are paid to establish their climate assessments – without any evidence. "
[ad_2]
Source link
