Van Dyke Test Day 12 Live Updates



[ad_1]

The proof is made for the day.

14:15 Prosecutors delay testimony on McDonald's past

Prosecutors attempted to postpone a series of witnesses called by the defense on Monday afternoon to show that Laquan McDonald had a history of violent behavior – witnesses who ended the testimony of the day.

On January 20, 2014, Miguel DeJesus spoke to testify about his own physical altercation at Cook County's juvenile detention center with McDonald's. After McDonald was detained that day, McDonald told him that he was on the sheet and "On the pills." Eventually, McDonald's became belligerent and hit him.

DeJesus said that he was able to take McDonald's and hold him against a glass partition while a quick intervention team showed up to help defuse the situation.

During her cross-examination, Assistant Deputy Attorney Marilyn Hite Ross specifically asked DeSesus when he knew Chicago policeman Jason Van Dyke at that time –

DeJesus said no.

1:50 pm Jury hears about Laquan McDonald's troubled past

Chicago police lawyers Jason Van Dyke used their second witness to delve into Laquan McDonald's troubled past – evidence that could be used to support a self-defense argument.

After a lunch break, Joseph Plaud, of the Cook County Sheriff's Department, took a stand and described an incident on August 23, 2013 involving McDonald's in the juvenile court.

Plaud said that he was working at his office in the detention area that day when he heard a bunch of screams and screams. Seconds later, he said, he saw the deputies take McDonald's to the dungeon.

"He was shouting, screaming, swearing, he was not at all happy," Plaud said.

Plaud also said that McDonald had spotted another youngster in the closed closet and started screaming "what's wrong?" Plaud and his partner tried to move McDonald's to another cell, but McDonald's continued shouting.

"Basically, it was just 'f, you, I'm not happy to be here, f – you, sheriff' s department, f – judge," said Plaud.

Plaud said his partner kept telling him to calm down. When he said that his partner had taken McDonald's hand to lead him to another cell, he said that McDonald had pulled his arm. Plaud said his partner hit him in the stomach, but that did not affect McDonald's. Plaud and his partner then spent three to five minutes fighting with McDonald's until they finally managed to handcuff him.

12:20 pm A defense expert claims that only one of the 16 shots hit McDonald while he was down

After listing the 16 injuries listed in the autopsy report, the defense expert, Dr. Shaku Teas, said Monday that only one injury had been inflicted while Laquan McDonald was on the ground .

The willingness of the teas to speculate on McDonald's body position when he was hit by each shot was a stark contrast to the more cautious testimony of last week by the prosecutor's expert, Dr. Ponni Arunkumar. The idea that McDonald was standing up for more than a few of the first shots seems to contradict the video of the police dashcam on the shooting and testimony of last week by a ballistics expert.

On video, McDonald falls to the ground in a little over a second after the first shot of Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke. During the testimony of an FBI ballistics expert last week, the prosecution played video of an FBI firearms instructor firing 16 shots on a human-sized target in about four seconds. A less qualified shooter took almost six seconds.

The teas also criticized the autopsy, repeatedly complaining that the pathologist had not done any dissection or taken extra x-rays to document the pathways of the wounds and the damage caused by the bullets.

Shaku teas

Pathologist Shaku Teas testified on Monday as an expert defense witness in the Jason Van Dyke murder trial at the Leighton Courthouse. | Photo of the pool Antonio Perez / Chicago Tribune

11:30 am Medical examiner says injury likely killed McDonald in minutes

Of the multiple gunshot wounds received by Laquan McDonald on the night of October 20, 2014, a single chest shot that ripped through a main artery probably killed him in minutes, said Monday a forensic pathologist by Jason Van Dyke's lawyers.

Dr. Shaku Teas, a former pathologist with the Cook County Medical Examiner's Office, was the first witness cited on Monday as the defense team opened its case. It appears that the testimony takes the jurors through the same set of autopsy photos they saw last week, during the four-hour testimony of the former colleague of Teas at the office of the medical examiner, the prosecution witness. , Dr. Ponni Arunkumar.

The teas provided more categorical answers as to whether McDonald's was standing or on the ground when he was shot, and what injuries probably caused his death. For the teas, this was the injury listed at # 4 in the autopsy report of the medical examiner, which had entered McDonald's chest on the right side.

"I think that's the one that caused Laquan's so quick death," she said, adding later: "I would say that it would have died here from one to five minutes."

The shot probably came as McDonald was standing, his torso facing Jason Van Dyke, Teas said.

"That would be consistent with the fact that Laquan turned to the officer when he was shot," she said.

The teas were of the opinion that, even though McDonald had a pulse while the paramedics were arriving for the first time, it was probably the useless beating of his heart and the teenager was showing only that. "agonist" breathing.

"It's breathing like you're not going to get there. It's close to death, "she said.

Last week, Arunkumar spent about four hours on the stand, cataloging what she said were 24 holes – including 16 entry wounds – on McDonald's body, as well as small wounds caused by fragments of debris. . Defense lawyer Tammy Wendt was opened with a line of questions intended to cast doubt on the results of the autopsy in the forensic doctor's office, asking him if Teas was able to talk about the autopsy with arunkumar.

The teas said that she had asked Arunkumar questions – why a young pathologist had been appointed to perform the autopsy, why the toxicology reports were done by several labs several times.

Such conversations are not unusual, Teas said, but Arunkumar did not want to talk.

"It's not uncommon, anyway. And I spoke to Dr. Arunkumar about other cases, and she was cooperative, "said Teas.

Laquan McDonald, Jason Van Dyke

X-rays of Laquan McDonald's body and a bullet case are shown to the jury on Monday at Jason Van Dyke's murder trial at the Leighton Court House. | Photo of the pool Antonio Perez / Chicago Tribune

7:25 am Will Van Dyke go to testify?

The legal team of Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke is expected to begin his defense on Monday with a series of witnesses, but the question is: will Van Dyke himself testify?

Van Dyke's team has to present its own expert on the lethal use of force, to counter the prosecution witness, who said last week that Van Dyke's Laquan McDonald shootings in 2014 were not justified.

Van Dyke's legal team should also show the jurors a computer animation that will recreate at least five of Van Dyke's 16 shots on McDonald's. The animation will be used to underline the defense's view that the now infamous video shot, already seen several times by the jury during the trial, does not show the shooting and the moments that took it preceded.

The forensic pathologist also testifies to the cause of death of McDonald and a ballistics expert.

The key question the defense faces is whether Van Dyke will speak to tell the jury what he saw and felt that night. Nobody can offer a better explanation than Van Dyke. But he faces a possibly brutal cross-examination that would require him to explain every shot he's shot at McDonald's, including those that hit the teenager when he was on the ground.

Loading…

[ad_2]
Source link