[ad_1]
Brodie Van Wagenen can do the job or he can not.
Simple, no?
That's all that will count with time. All the current noise will fade because no scenario, with the exception of success or failure, has longer life in America.
So there will be a lot of feedback on Van Wagenen's qualifications as the 13th General Manager of Mets history. There will be tons of writings and hints about who will and will not speak with him, with which former clients he must refrain from trading due to prior representation.
Business will become business and everyone will join the big boys league, whether they like the fact that Van Wagenen is the GM of the Mets or not. The hostilities and daring reports that seem so relevant today will go down. What we will know is whether the mission statement that Van Wagenen sold to the Wilpons – "win now and win in the future" – is one of his skills.
"I recognize that I am not the path of least resistance," said Van Wagenen.
That would have been Chaim Bloom, who, though 35 years old, has developed a solid reputation for his intelligence as he climbs the Rays baseball hierarchy, or Doug Melvin, who at age 66 has offered sagacity and serenity . These are the other two finalists who succeeded Sandy Alderson. Despite their age difference, they would have proposed a traditional candidate who would have created less anxiety and bluster within the sector.
Instead, the Mets are "off the beaten path," in the words of Jeff Wilpon. Except we have been here before. Joe Garagiola Jr., Steve Greenberg, Rick Hahn, Jeff Moorad and Dave Stewart are among those who have gone from agent agents to team leaders. For example, the Players Association is not as concerned about the transition for Van Wagenen as it is because it has established protocols to address it.
In terms of coming from a non-traditional place to be the general manager, the most successful leader in Mets history was Frank Cashen, who had been a sports writer. Alderson was an inexperienced lawyer in baseball when he was hired as an outside lawyer by the A's in the 1980s, and he rose through the ranks to join GM. Van Wagenen probably has more qualifications today to be GM than Brian Cashman in 1998, when he was promoted by the Yankees. Today, Cashman is the dean of GM New York and provides ongoing service as GM for a team in the majors.
Nowadays, websites that deal with baseball, NASA or any other place are looking for important jobs for important jobs.
As one veteran executive said: "You're not a baseball guy until you've won, so you're a baseball guy.
In terms of knowing information about private players from past clients, Van Wagenen has it. It would be the same for any leader of a team interviewed with the Mets about their former team. In addition, these executives would know everything their organization did in a proprietary way. Question: Do you think they share some of this personal information to sell for an interview or not? And do they give it all up when they are hired? These answers would be yes and yes.
Should former Van Wagenen clients, such as Jacob deGrom or Todd Frazier, be concerned about the fact that he knows more private information than they would like? that the Mets know? Perhaps But the quest to find information about players and processes is endless for all teams. You might be shocked by the amount of fact research that is going on in the majors.
And that could be a strong area for Van Wagenen. He had clients through the majors. Thus, it has specific details about the types of practices, among others, strength and conditioning, analysis, sports science, etc., and about what players find the best and the worst.
Van Wagenen's best friend and former client is Houston's director, A.J. Hinch. Do you think the two have discussed the nuances of one of the most advanced organizations of majors? Just as I think that former Astros coach Alex Cora had brought this knowledge when he became director of the Red Sox – that's how the industry works, the people move all the time, bringing information to their former employers.
Mets assistant John Ricco said Van Wagenen was part of the CAA group that had collected detailed questionnaires from most of the 30 teams as part of last season's Shohei Ohtani recruitment. The clubs were invited to explain the development of their players, their medical training and their performance philosophy.
Thus, Van Wagenen may not occupy this post in a traditional way, but in a forum where information is the most vital resource in decision making, he has tons of it. Can he make it one of the Mets' buzzwords for this day – "sustainable victory" – as he promised at Wednesday's press conference?
That's all that will finally count. Not the work he comes from.
Source link
