Viral viral video of the persistent baby hides a dark technological subtext a dark technological subtext



[ad_1]

AAnother video video surfaced and became viral last Saturday because of the presence of all the typical ingredients of an online video: cute animals, a touch of drama and an inspiring, so kitschy message. But as more and more people watched the video more closely, observers found an ominous subtext that asks the public to re-evaluate the typical ingredients of a video that appears online: cute animals, a touch of drama and an inspiring message so kitschy. But as more and more people watched the video more closely, observers discovered a sinister subtext that forced the public to re-evaluate kindness.

In the video, a grizzly bear and his cub face a heart-rending ascent on a snowy, steep mountain. The tension rises as the mother reaches the top, but the baby falls backwards, climbing and slipping sharply. When the lion cub almost reaches her mother, the camera zooms in and the mother sabotages her efforts, sending her lower than ever before, her little paws gripping as she slips out of the frame. Despite the setback, the small persists, resuming the climb until it finally reaches safety. Gathered, the mother and her child go away. It is the perfect story of perseverance and patience.

The images from this encounter were captured by a drone and hosted on ViralHog, which helped it become viral after the Twitter user published it @ziyatong last Saturday with the caption: "We could all learn a lesson of this cub: raise your eyes and give "do not give up. tweet has accumulated more than 21 million views, 180,000 retweets and 510,000 likes, adding to the 450,000 views of the original video.

When the video started for the first time, many viewers found it significant, citing the importance and cost-effectiveness of determination and struggle. But when biologists and drone pilots watched the video, rather than inspiring an example of persistence, they saw another example of how overzealous drone pilots harass animals and encroach on their habitats. natural.

How did the drone affect grizzlies?

The hidden fate of these bears was first announced by Clayton T. Lamb, Ph.D. candidate at the University of Alberta who is researching grizzly bears. As he explained to the AtlanticAlthough the situation seems natural in the video, it was almost certainly induced by the presence of the drone.

"There is no reason for a woman to accept this risk unless she is forced to," says Lamb. Combining the short time it took the camera to zoom in on the Cub and the unexpected sweep of the mother, Lamb said the mother, visibly embarrassed by the presence of the drone, had tried to protect her small in the distance from danger.

How the planet Earth Wannabes deals damage

The whole episode shows how awesome cinematic clips have allowed drones to hide a vital aspect of technology: their loud hum, which can be more annoying and disturbing than cars, according to NASA research. And it's for humans, who know what drones can be. Buzzing can interrupt the survival of animals, chasing them from food sources and hunting them for long distances. University of Minnesota researcher Mark A. Ditmer has found that even a road trip can cause high stress in bears, as measured by heart rate peaks.

The video of ViralHog is not an occasional meeting: Sophie Gilbert, Assistant Professor of Wildlife Ecology at the University of Idaho, has compiled a playlist of 121 videos of drone encounters with wildlife. But Gilbert does not demonize the technology itself and shows that well-used drones can give biologists non-invasive access to hard-to-reach places, opening the way for new databases.

That said, for this to happen in a consistent way, regulation must catch up with new technology. In addition to the FAA's general rules on the use of UAVs, which mainly concern passengers and other aircraft, the regulatory network is uncoordinated and varies widely from state to state. The National Parks Service has also banned unmanned aircraft in most parks, creating more confusion about the position of drones. In the meantime, researchers at the University of Adelaide have developed a code of practice for the safe use of drones in the wild, although these standards have not yet been widely adopted.

But we do not need regulation to recognize distress, only common sense. No viral injection is worth harassing animals or encroaching on their natural habitat.

[ad_2]
Source link