[ad_1]
The president has long mocked Warren for claiming that she had a connection with Native Americans and said he would like to confront her about this in a presidential debate.
"It's not just casual racism, warriors, tomahawk … Trump can say what he wants from me, but make fun of Native Americans, or any other group , to target me, it's not what America means, "she says.
In what might be a glimpse of things to come, the president immediately rejected Warren's attempt to pick his own story.
Trump's jokes sum up the riddle of the Democrats as the 2020 campaign approaches, even before the 2018 mid-race race ends in 21 days.
As a supposedly gilded generation of Republican candidates and Hillary Clinton discovered in 2016, Trump is a dangerous because he lacks shame. There is no level at which it will not be lowered for political gain. If the truth and the evidence – or a DNA test, called "junk science" by his adviser Kellyanne Conway Monday – annoy him, he will jump.
Warren Monday published an elegant, nominative, convention-style biographical video, with her holding a beer and showing it in her native Oklahoma with her older brothers. It seemed like an effort to prevent Trump from defining it and introducing himself to the Americans if she decided to run for president.
But it will probably not be. Trump, who longs for his enemies and invents them if they do not exist, is delighted with Warren's decision to hire him.
If the facts do not favor it, he will simply invent a more useful political reality.
Warren's dilemma
Warren faced a difficult choice. She could have ignored Trump's taunts and kept up with her message about the middle class's pain in an economy rigged by the rich. But Trump was sure to follow her.
The issue also greatly affects the president, as it offers an opening to spit Democrats for a perceived obsession with racial identity and minorities that works well with Trump's white electoral base.
His gesture, which will give him a brief moment in the spotlight in front of a bloated Democratic field, is also a harbinger for party activists that if they choose to confront Trump, it will not hold back. In fact, she was already hounding the president on Monday, in a way that seems to have escaped him before.
"I have passed this test and published the results for all those who are interested in seeing because I have nothing to hide." What are you hiding, @realDonaldTrump? Free up your tax returns – or the House run by the Democrats will do it for you soon enough, Mr. President. "Warren tweeted.
But his strategy carries potential risks.
Speaking of the issue, she allows Trump to set the stage for the first campaign – a technique to which he dropped GOP lead candidates such as Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and Chris Christie last time.
Democrats debate the 2020 plan
Warren's play coincides with the intensification of the debate among Democrats on the best way to deal with Trump in 2020.
The 2016 Democratic candidate was referring to the mid-term, but she also effectively introduced a tonal indicator for the 2020 Democratic candidates.
She said that her 2016 mantra, "when they go low, we go high", still holds, even though its effectiveness was debatable two years ago.
There are other approaches that could work. By 2020, Americans might be tired of the crash rhetoric and the grueling daily fatigues of life under Trump and could adopt a quieter and more conventional choice.
Or perhaps a thorny campaign – Bernie Sanders, who offers liberal political solutions on health care, inequality and the environmental movement, could be a good choice for the time. But moderation can not exploit the furious energy raging at the grassroots of the Democratic people before the middle elections.
In a party electrified by opposition to Trump and bitter by the defeat of a fight in the Supreme Court, there is enough to fuel a scorched earth campaign against the president.
Yet, no one can say whether a total negative aggression can go against the master of the "back and forth", which has fueled racial and social divisions to form a winning coalition from a fervent Republican base in 2016.
He could also end up hurting opponents as much as by Trump. After all, Republican opponents such as Rubio saw their marks tarnished by joining Trump in the abyss in a way that clashed with their more moderate political personality.
All out
A Warren assistant told Manu Raju, of CNN, that the DNA test was part of an effort to disclose as much information as possible, including a decade of tax returns, as well as records. academics while the senator weighed for 2020.
She had a mixed reaction from Democratic political professionals.
Jen Psaki, a former campaign advisor and director of White House communication for Obama, told CNN's Jake Tapper that Warren's calculation was "smart" although it probably would not work entirely because Trump would answer.
"She will run for the presidency in a clear way, she wants to clean up, she will do everything in her power to achieve it … then she wants to go ahead," said Psaki.
Jim Messina, one of Psaki's former colleagues, who led Obama's re-election campaign in 2012, worried about Warren's delay.
"Discuss the substance you want, but why 22 days before a crucial election where we must imperatively win the House and Senate to save America, why did @SenWarren have to make his announcement now Why can not Dems stay focused? " Messina tweeted.
Joe Trippi, head of Howard Dean's 2004 Democratic presidential campaign, said Warren had waited too long.
"I would have done that a year or two ago … because they did not do it, she had to (now)," he said.
Source link
