Why Kenan Thompson thinks Pete Davidson's "SNL" joke about Dan Crenshaw crossed a line



[ad_1]

Pete Davidson has been the subject of much criticism this week after making an inappropriate "joke" about Republican congressional candidate Dan Crenshaw over the weekend. Saturday Night Live episode. Almost two days later, SNL Veteran Kenan Thompson explained why he thought Pete Davidson's joke about Dan Crenshaw had crossed a line during a Today's show published Monday morning, November 5th. Echoing the massive wave of online reaction that erupted as a result of the Saturday night episode, Thompson's comments on his co-star's "joke" were pretty clear: Davidson completely missed the goal with "Weekend Update" quolibet. And Thompson was not really impressed.

In response to a question from Craig Melvin, one of the Today & # 39; hui hosts on Monday morning (he asked whether or not Davidson "crossed a line," in Thompson's opinion), the actor, unsurprisingly, replied in the affirmative. "That seems definitely the case," he told the hosts. Thompson then explained why David Davidson's joke about Crenshaw – which made fun of the candidate's physical appearance, namely an eye patch that he wore since his war injury in 2012 – was so disrespectful for many, especially for veterans who have already served. He then confided to Hoda Kotb and Kathie Lee Gifford that he would not have made the same joke by saying, "My father is a veteran – from Vietnam – and personally I do not never go necessarily. [with comedy]. "

Of course, Thompson is no stranger to the stand-up arena. He knows that often, some of the most remarkable jokes tend to be at the expense of their subject. "There are no real filters in the world when [comedians are] trying to make a good joke or whatever, and we try to respect that, "said Thompson during Monday. Today & # 39; hui appearance. But, he continued, this is not an excuse for lack of awareness, especially when the feelings and / or reputation of another person are at stake:

"At the same time, when you miss the target, you offend people, so you need to be a little more aware of my point of view."

Hopefully, those who heard Davidson's joke about Crenshaw are already struggling to oppose Thompson's opinion. After all, whether Davidson wanted the joke to be misinterpreted or not – just for the record, it does not seem to be – his comments were always really insensitive. And as capable as it is, it is the least we can say. For those who missed out on Saturday night's all-new "Weekend Update" segment, Davidson resumed his thoughts on a handful of mid-term election candidates.

But, rather than criticize their ability to apply, Davidson's rather turned to the appearance of each candidate. And when Crenshaw's photo appeared, what began as a series of almost crude comedies quickly escalated into a turn that many viewers found to be an uncomfortable and useless mockery. Referring apparently to Crenshaw's lost eye during a tour of Afghanistan about eight years ago, Davidson's crack looked like this:

"You may be surprised to hear that he's a Texas congressional candidate and not a hitman in a porn movie, I'm sorry, I know he's lost an eye to the war or elsewhere. "

Eek. If Davidson "missed the target", then it seems safe enough to say that he missed it for at least two or three kilometers. Drag the critics that have popped up on social media then Crenshaw replied to the "joke" on Twitter "I hope @nbcsnl recognizes that veterinarians do not deserve to see their wounds being used to trick their jokes," he wrote in a tweet that has since garnered more than 118 times of a "joke." on the social platform. But like People mentioned in his Monday morning report, the congressional candidate seemed much less upset during his recent conversation with TMZ, also published on Sunday.

In a video posted by the outlet, Crenshaw said, "I want us to get away from this culture in which we ask for an apology every time someone speaks badly," adding, "We do not want to do anything about it. we do not need to be outraged. " And while Crenshaw's choice in this respect is admirable, his response seems to emphasize more the importance of comments like those of Thompson, who hold people accountable. Because, in the end, Crenshaw should not be responsible for defending himself against Davidson's bad tone, anyway.

I would like to congratulate Thompson for taking a stand and keeping it, even when it involved criticizing your colleague's behavior on television during the day.

[ad_2]
Source link