Vanity Fair dissuades the New York Times from celebrating at the Oscars

Like the nasty girl from a high school film, Vanity Fair at the last minute disavowed the New York Times of her famous Oscar night, because the Times had said some rude things about it .

The Gray Lady released Thursday an article by Katherine Rosman and Brook Barnes entitled "It was the hottest Oscar night. What happened? "

He suggested that the bash had been spoiled by corporate sponsorships and rival parties, and said that "two civilians" had obtained invitations – which were once in the image of the Holy Grail, even among Hollywood insiders – Marriott points. "

We were told that on Friday, while Times correspondent Ben Widdicombe was flying to cover the evening of Sunday night with his new column "No Regrets," Vanity Fair canceled his invitation, recalling that The Times had already released cover of the VF party this year. "

But we are told that Times employees believe that the new VF editor – and former Times employee – Radhika Jones should have the good sense to intervene, restore mental health and reinstate the invitation.

We were told that insiders thought that the move was probably a "reflexive" reaction from the magazine's haughty reputable editor, Conde Nast, who "demands that they prove that they have the biggest d-town ".

But, according to one insider, "Radhika is so criticized that she would let her publication behave so unprofessionally and in such a low-profile way."

Meanwhile, Widdicome asked us to comment, "I'm so mad at Brooks and Katie that their writing dissuaded me from attending a party before mine." Conde Nast did not immediately respond.