[ad_1]
If we make a profound evaluation of the president Nicolás Maduro from a purely political point of view we will definitely conclude that his actions have been really good. Having a disapproval greater than 70% of the population and growing; coupled with widespread discontent a little over 80% and yet, with an extraordinary ability to remain a centralized and unique reference figure in the direction of forces aligned with the Bolivarian Revolution and also, practically diluting the flat opposition form in the form of political atomization to prevent the emotional connection with the bulk of discontent; it's a politico-strategic action of a huge bill.
Having sown discord and mistrust in the leaders the opponents adds to his plethora of successes in political management. The underestimated substitute of the former president Hugo Chávez was more astute than many imagined after winning this tight election of April 2013 against Henrique Capriles . In addition, despite internal differences that appear with little clarity to public opinion, within the party forces of Chavism-Madurism, it has managed to become a unique reference within the spectrum of the party that covers about 20% national. This internal solidification has made – at least until now – repressed any fracture that could compromise its control on the state institutions and most importantly On the Armed Force It is therefore interesting to say that Maduro has shown himself extraordinarily good in terms of political management that he maintains power even with internal and external support of legitimacy absolutely deteriorated.
On the other side of the coin, that is, the bad Maduro, has to do with the country's economic management . It has been totally overtaken until now.
The social and economic indicators have deteriorated by leaps and bounds, severely affecting all segments of the population, but especially the most humble and the most vulnerable. Hyperinflation is totally underway without any hope generated by a correction or a change in public policy. The ideological seizure of a model led to levels of situational blindness justifying the death of capitalism (19459014) as something alien to the population served by the social policy of the state Venezuelan ] and closing on all kinds of economic reforms.
Maduro flatly refused to accept that the same formulas that have repeatedly failed over the past 20 years can be changed to transform economic reality. The pragmatism that he used to the maximum in political management did not want to develop it with regard to the economy. In this he did not even pay attention to Ecuador and Bolivia . His ideological view of the state's control over the economy prevailed until today, despite the red numbers that many state-owned companies are presenting. His economic stubbornness is unmatched.
The good Maduro served to keep him in power. The bad Maduro served to bring the population to levels of quality of life much lower than all the other historical times of the last hundred years of republican life. This apparent contradiction will have its consequences. Will the lines of good and evil be crossed? Will they run out? where will they change? These are answers that we have in the very short term depending on the dynamic country in which we live.
***
The opinions expressed in this section are the sole responsibility of the authors. [19659004] (Visited 5 times, 5 times today)
Comments
[ad_2]
Source link
