[ad_1]
In these days, on the occasion of commemorating official sectors on the anniversary of the birth of Commander Hugo Chávez, a controversy between several political actors jumped into the public debate, around what was going on. they call "the legacy" of the late president.
The "Defenders of the Chavista Legacy", essentially former ministers and former government leaders, at the time of the splendor of the revolution where the oil manna largely favored them, claim that Nicolás Maduro betrayed the postulates and guidelines of life for the leader of communist militarism. They add that Maduro has economically ruined the country, but the most serious thing for them is that it politically ruined the socialist project
In these days of July 2018, it is important to evoke the opinions reviews by former ministers Andrés Izarra, Rodrigo Cabezas and Jorge Giordani
We share with the aforementioned former ministers the consideration of the manifest inability of Nicolás Maduro to lead the destinies of the Venezuelan state. We share his assertions about the erratic nature of his politics and about the evil human team that accompanies him, with which he deepens every day the tragedy brought to us by the public policies of the Castrochavista model.
Andrés Izarra expressed, through his Twitter account, the following: "On the occasion of the anniversary of Commander Chavez, an urgent appeal to save his legacy and our country. already! "
According to Izarra regarding the need to promote a" change of government already ". But to save Chávez's legacy no. The same argument is presented by former Minister Giordani, as I will point out later
Rodrigo Cabezas, for his part, said: "There is no professional conduct of economic policy from Venezuela ", and he is right. Only that this evil was inoculated in the conduct of the state by Lieutenant-Colonel Hugo Chavez, who had 17 finance ministers, and with the silence and accompaniment of Cabezas himself, as vice-president. Chairman of the Finance Committee of the National Assembly, as Minister and President of the Central Bank of Venezuela, he destroyed the autonomy of the issuing entity, allowing him to reform the law that governs the institution, turn it into a small box of the presidential office and into a kind of Aladin machine that, from a computer, it makes the country's money supply grow numerically.
If Chávez, who "was the father of the revolution", had no qualms about violating the Constitution, creating a National Development Fund instead of Macroeconomic Stabilization Fund which dedicated the article 321 of the current Constitution, Maduro, at his example, advances his own list of attacks against the letter m Agna and economic rationality
What Chavez created was a fund of waste of national wealth, which had to be saved during the time of hardship, and he devoted himself to distributing the money of our oil to all the borders of the planet, especially on our Latin-American continent. But he went further, in addition to having squandered the most extraordinary fortune ever received in his history by our country, he devoted himself to debt the republic, also to levels never recorded in our history economic. This was the previous phase that brought us to this debacle, in this financial management, Chávez did not conduct a "professional conduct of Venezuela's economic policy." Only, at the time, Cabezas was the only One of the partners of this "unprofessional management of our economy."
Maduro has just completed his task of hanging on to the dogmas of socialism taught in Cuba, with policies such as control of exchange, price control, expropriations, digital money issue, etc., bringing with them an economic holocaust never known in our republican history
Giordani wrote these days:
"What I want to put prominently in this writing, this is what happened in Caracas, at the Miraflores Palace, when he summoned us (Chávez) to some of his collaborators, on December 8 at the Miraflores Palace, announcing what he said on that occasion; who, in my full conviction meant a grave error on his part which explains why the Venezuelans, after his death, and from April 2013, pay an inconsistency with his memory, with his legacy and Venezuelan history. "(Portal Aporrea). Https://www.aporrea.org/actualidad/a266943.html)
L' The serious error of Chávez was to have assumed the direction of the Venezuelan State without have the necessary training for this, and have chosen to accompany it to characters like his Giordani, who is one of the people responsible for setting up the planned, centralized and superstatized economic model that allowed wasteful already mentioned.
Maduro did not have any inconsistency; He continued the same pattern that Giordani advised Chávez. Recall that this character confessed in his resignation letter to Maduro, after hiring the International reserves of the Republic, to launch a wave of populist public spending allowing them to win the presidential elections of October 2012, and the regional elections of the same year.When Chavez died, and Maduro assumed in 2013, the evil was done: the Re public was bankrupt and mortgaged at disproportionate levels. And Giordani was and is, one of the makers of such a tragedy.
The bomb of "inconsistency with" the history of Venezuela "exploded in the face of all the ruling clique, only that Chávez had already left to avoid attending his work disastrous. Evil can now Mr. Giordani come to try to wash his face in front of the country, and in front of the story, expressing that Chávez was mistaken in choosing Maduro, avoiding the immense responsibility that he has in the disastrous management that made our economy
Of course, Chávez made a mistake in selecting Maduro. But not only in that. He was wrong in all the purpose of the authoritarian, rentier and corrupt state that he had left behind. This is his true heritage. Today, we see that he has done the death and misery of the Venezuelan people.
Therefore, there is no legacy to save; as Izarra and Giordani maintain. What is needed is to save Venezuela from the criminal gang that the late commander left in charge of his disastrous state model, to restore democracy and progress to our nation.
[ad_2]
Source link
