[ad_1]
We expect good matches in the quarterfinals. One becomes demanding in the Cups of the world and aspires to better spectacles than, for example, England-Colombia. Until now, they promise more crosses on one side than on the other. Uruguay-France and Belgium-Brazil should come out fairly. Let's analyze each case.
Uruguay-France. It is important to know if Cavani is playing. If he's not there, he leaves almost all the work in Suarez. With the two together, it can complicate the opponent's markers. Uruguay is hard to catch badly stopped. Use a classic 4-4-2. I was surprised that in Argentina they criticized Bentancur so much when he played at Boca. He does not reach the goal, it is true, but he manages the ball very well, he is tall and is only 21 years old! I do not imagine that France will complicate Uruguay with long frontal blows. Uruguay is not going to give, it is difficult to enter. And France is not going to give a lot of benefits either. Deschamps is more Italian than French and will try to leave the ball to the opponent. I would not be surprised if they went to penalties. Among the defenses, I see better the Uruguayan: I do not think it gives as much space and time to the French attackers as Argentina.
Brazil-Belgium. Both are trying to play and that is the game that generates more expectations. Belgium fell asleep and was suddenly 0-2 with two goals from Japan. He had the chance to quickly reduce the disadvantage and the rival was innocent: he did not even change to maintain this difference. Notice how it was the third goal: De Bruyne ran almost 60 yards with the ball. Beware of Belgian air power and its power of purpose. The great strength of Brazil, which makes him an excellent candidate, is that Tite made them understand their players the need to play as a team, not in a team. Jesus goes from the steering wheel to the left when Coutinho tires. The scheme is also 4-4-2, simple. It's true: I wish Neymar did not always want to make the big game, look for the super goal, but it would be easier, especially in the midfield. Let him touch and continue. In this way, he would not receive unnecessary kicks. That they stick it inside the big zone, anyway. If Brazil recovers Marcelo's production and imbalance. His wealth is such that Marcelo did not qualify for the last match or Dani Alves for the entire Cup.
Russia-Croatia. The Russians have to wonder how they got there. They put sacrifice and solidarity. In attack, they are repeated with big balls (Dzyuba). They did not show much football. Croatia on the other hand, yes, but it was not enough to avoid the penalties with Denmark. The archer saved him. Croatians are the most players on this side of the key. In principle, they are candidates.
Sweden-England. Sweden is an example of the teams that can win without having so much time. Yesterday, he lost possession with the Swiss, and yet he won. England does not give guarantees. One thing is the English championship and another one his selection. He has no creativity or inspiration: he is primari. The last good I remember is that of Spain 82. I save Kane, I like that, it is one of the 9 most complete. Here, there is no company. Colombia started with a single striker, kicked for the first time at 46 minutes and further complicated.
Source link
