[ad_1]
Those who enter the Spanish version of Wikipedia will find a surprise: no matter which article you want to access, the site shows only one text, in which it explains that the site will remain inactive
The reason? Request the elimination of Articles 11 and 13 of the new EU Copyright Directive to be voted tomorrow morning in the European Parliament.
"Instead of updating the author's copyright laws in Europe and promoting the participation of all citizens in the information society, the directive would threaten freedom in line and impose new filters, barriers and restrictions to access the web.
If the proposal is approved in its current version, actions such as sharing an article on social networks or accessing it via a search engine would be more complicated on the Internet, the same Wikipedia would be threatened, "they explain in the Spanish version of the encyclopedia Community
Article 11 of the directive to vote tomorrow provides that you share a quote from Any text, audio or video (be it a line, a paragraph, an animated GIF, a photo, etc.) is prohibited for 20 years unless the author agrees a paid license.
In this thread we allo Do you share some clues about copyright reform in Europe, which threatens Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects? https://t.co/iAEeMiCOKm ?? #SaveYourInternet #SaveWikipedia @ElenaValenciano pic.twitter.com/VzPllDVSvD
– Wikimedia Spain (@wikimedia_fr) View author's profile July 3, 2018
In writing the text of the law, sharing a link to a note in Facebook or in a discussion forum is a crime; In addition, the fine must pay for the site that allows this (Facebook, etc.). It's a tax to put the link to one site in another.
This is a reissue of Canon AEDE (Association of Spanish Newspaper Publishers) that we tried to impose in Spain a few years ago and which required the Pay a cannon for each link that will link from one site to the other.
The new directive leaves in each country the decision of its implementation, which makes even more complex the operation of the sites with multinational presence.
Article 13, for its part, requires companies that publish content to be confirmed, before making it public, that the publisher has the right to do so.
The problem is that in the vast majority of cases (a home video uploaded to YouTube, a photo posted on Twitter or Facebook) is almost impossible because there is no reference to take to contrast; it also affects satirical content, music covers, critics, etc.
? WARNING?
To protest against the likely approval of a reform of the Copyright Law in the European Parliament, we decided as a community to deactivate @Wikipedia in Spanish for 36 hours. https://t.co/meh050GUUY #Wikipediaseapaga #SalvemosInternet #SaveYourInternet pic.twitter.com/BAzZQ5JpSt– Wikimedia's Guide to United States (@Wikimedia_mx) July 4 2018
"Article 13 seems to create such legal uncertainty that online services will have no choice but to monitor, filter and block the communications of European citizens if they want to have a chance to stay in business, "he warned. a statement from the Electronic Frontier Foundation
The two articles were approved in June at the Committee on Legal Affairs by some votes and now they should be debated in plenary session of the European Parliament; The Spanish, Italian and other Wikipedia took the decision to close as a form of protest; several other European sites follow similar paths.
If the proposal is approved, it will go to the European Council (composed of all the Presidents or Heads of State of the Member States of the European Union), who will have to decide when it approves the text or if you request changes; many of the activists who have spoken offer alternatives to defend the copyright of European content without affecting the possibility of showing it in other sites.
[ad_2]
Source link
