[ad_1]
Since the summary of the report was released by Attorney General Bill Barr, President Donald Trump asserted that the report indicated that there was "no impediment" – he has continued to make this request since the publication of the redacted report.
The facts first: Trump is wrong on the obstruction but correct on the collusion.
The report makes it clear that "even if this report does not conclude to the commission of a crime by the president, it does not exonerate it either" on issues of obstruction. Mueller also wrote that "we have not reached an ultimate conclusion about the conduct of the president" and that we "were unable to reach" a judgment on the issue of obstruction.
Trump is however right to say that the report did not reveal any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Although the report did not establish any "collusion" between the partners or Trump's campaign and Russia to interfere in the 2016 election, Mueller wrote that campaign members knew that they would benefit from illegal acts conducted by Russia to influence the election, and that they did not engage criminally. to help Russia to interfere in the countryside.
Mueller in the fire
The facts first: The report confirms that McGahn had received the order to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein turned to Mueller, then said to lie about never asked to fire Mueller.
From after multiple interviews with McGahn and other people, the report says that after the announcement of a news saying that Trump had ordered McGahn to fire Mueller, "the President … asked McGahn to deny that he had been instructed to dismiss the special advocate ". McGahn rejected this order and "insisted that the president's memories had asked him to remove the special advocate," the report said.
Later, in a conversation with McGahn, Trump asked, "Did I say the word & # 39; fire?" McGahn replied, "What you said is:" Call Rod (Rosenstein), tell Rod that Mueller has conflict and can not be the special counsel. " Trump responded that he never said "fire" and simply wanted McGahn to draw Rosenstein's attention to the perceived problem and leave it to him, according to the report.
McGahn, however, understood that Trump was saying, "Call Rod, there's conflict, Mueller has to go," the report says.
Trump Tower meeting
CNN's Jim Acosta asked Conway, "Why did we originally tell a false story about this, that the meeting was about Russian adoptions?" Conway disapproved of Acosta's description, noting that the statement by Trump Jr. said the meeting was "mainly" about Russian adoptions.
The facts first: It is incorrect to suggest that Trump Jr.'s initial statement on the meeting was justified by the Mueller Report.
The Mueller Report, however, explains how Trump Junior was promised "official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and his relations with Russia" as "part of Russia and his government's support for Mr. Trump" In response to this offer, Trump Jr. replied that "if that's what you say, I like it." The meeting was then scheduled.
According to the report, when the Russian lawyer Trump Jr. and his associates met at Trump Tower could not provide incriminating information about Clinton, the conversation turned to the Magnitsky law, which imposed sanctions on several senior Russian officials. Russia, in response to these sections, has banned all Russian adoptions in the United States.
To suggest that the meeting was "mainly" about Russian adoptions is totally misleading. The Mueller report indicates that the reason the Trump administration was interested in the meeting was the "dirt" promised to Clinton. The claim also ignores the discussion on the Magnitsky law, documented in the report.
Testify in front of Mueller
Mueller and his team interviewed Hope Hicks, Sarah Sanders, the two leading campaigners, as well as the campaign's first director, Corey Lewandowski, the former campaign chair, Paul Manafort, campaign director , Steve Bannon, and Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
Facebook ads from Russia
The facts first: Russia's efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election through social media have proven to be more than just a "couple" of Facebook ads.
The Internet Research Agency, a group supported by the Russian government, "has bought more than 3,500 commercials and expenses amounted to about $ 100,000," the report says, citing Facebook.
The Internet Research Agency has promoted groups created on Facebook with these advertisements. The agency's publications on these pages touched between 29 and 126 million US nationals, according to the report. Although the effects of these efforts on the 2016 election are the subject of debate, the characterization of Kushner as an agency that buys "some ads on Facebook" is incorrect.
[ad_2]
Source link