[ad_1]
A discussion on a forum gets a little spicy
Forums have, from time immemorial, been the hotbed of arguments that degenerate far beyond any rational level of debate. A recent dusting in the forums for Thunder of war, however, could take the cake.
War Thunder, developed by Gaijin Entertainment, is a multiplayer vehicular combat game, positioned as the “most complete” MMO military game, dedicated to aviation, armored vehicles and naval craft ranging from the early 20th century to the present day. One of these vehicles is the Challenger 2, a main battle tank in service with the British Army.
As reported by the UK Defense Journal, a player who identifies as the commander of a Challenger 2 argued that Thunder of warthe representation of is not entirely accurate. And in an effort to prove their point, they released images of the Army Equipment Support Publication (AESP) Challenger 2, basically the user’s manual to show that it was not modeled correctly.
The images have since been removed, but the Journal report says the document had the “UK RESTRICTED” label crossed out and an “UNCLASSIFIED” stamp added. Additional sections would have been completely masked.
Templar_, a senior technical moderator, responded with the following:
“We have written confirmation from the Ministry of Defense that this document remains classified. By continuing to broadcast it you are breaking the Official Secrets Law as the disclaimer on the cover of the document states, an offense of up to 14 years in prison if prosecuted. Of this you are already aware, as a person on duty you have signed a declaration that you understand the act and the actions it requires you to take. Anytime you post this you are putting us (Gaijin International Representatives), especially any UK citizen, in hot water as the warning so helpfully states that unauthorized retention of a protected document is an offense.
So, yuck. Community manager “Smin1080p” also commented on the post, saying that prior to any discussion or bug report, “proof of declassification of these documents will be required as well as where they came from.”
“The last time such a document was shared, which claimed to be ‘unclassified’, it was in fact still filed and it was confirmed that it should never have been shared,” they write. “We make it very clear that we will not process any source material unless it is publicly available and fully declassified with the rights to prove it.”
I’ve seen some people get into some really weird and hilarious arguments over the years. I’ve seen them set up in all kinds of ways. I have never seen such a thing.
[ad_2]
Source link