[ad_1]
The Washington Post editorial board has spoken out in favor of censorship as part of big tech’s continuing efforts to shut down the social media platform Speak.
In the article headlined, “Talking deserved to be dismantled. We still need new rules for the Internet,” the Post described the app as a “fringe, laissez-faire social media site” that has potentially yielded to President Trump another platform after his ban on Twitter and suspensions elsewhere. But now even Talking is no longer an option for the president since Apple and Google removed the app from its stores and Amazon Web Services essentially removed the entire program.
THE CEO OF PARLER BLASTS AOC, ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO CALL FOR BANNING HIS APP
“Mr. Trump and his supporters say they are victims of anti-conservative discrimination. Their complaints are not convincing,” the editorial board wrote. “It’s legitimate for corporate actors to rub their speech sites with the potential to cause harm, like the explicit plot that preceded last week’s armed insurgency on Capitol Hill.”
After acknowledging that the newspaper is owned by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, the Post called for more “regulation” of the Internet to “ensure security”.
“If we want rules of conduct for Twitters and Web Speakers – rules on incitement to violence, for example – they should be set by our elected representatives, not by unelected CEOs,” explained the post. “And if we want these rules to be applied fairly, without targeting rhetoric that is just unpopular, then we should insist that companies put in place systems of transparency, notification and appeal for their decisions.
CONSERVATIVES FLEE TO TALK FOLLOWING THE PERMANENT SUSPENSION OF TWITTER FROM TRUMP
The editorial board then continued, “Some would say this puts us on a slippery slope towards unacceptable restrictions on expression. They are right, but the alternative is violent rhetoric left unchecked, which we now know too well can lead to violent action. It is time for the public to insist that the government do its job and set rules that balance the urgency of free speech with the need for public safety. ”
Parler, which describes itself as an impartial platform that champions free speech, saw a surge in new users after Twitter announced that President Trump had been permanently banned from his platform, prompting supporters of the president to flee to the pro-Trump application.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Soon after, however, Speak Himself was besieged by liberal critics and other tech giants, accused of allowing extremist rhetoric to circulate on the platform in the wake of the riots in the last week at Capitol Hill.
Parler retaliated against Amazon by filing an antitrust lawsuit against the Bezos-run company.
[ad_2]
Source link