[ad_1]
Speaking Tuesday on CNN, Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) claimed that the United States was behind the attack on the Aramco oil power plant in Saudi Arabia , allegedly launched by Iran. Referring to the severe sanctions imposed on Iran by the United States, Gabbard said: "This latest attack against Saudi Arabia is a retaliatory attack because of all the sanctions in place that essentially prevent it from happening. Iran to sell its oil on the market ".
Gabbard, whose history includes support for the Syrian regime allied with Iran, also attacked President Trump, saying: "He treats our troops as if we could be pledged or prostituted to the highest bidder. ".
The exchange behind Gabbard's claim that the US would have pushed Iran to launch their attack began when CNN's Poppy Harlow asked, "You're running for president. If you were president right now, what would your relationship be with Iran? "
Gabbard replied:
I would see the situation well. This latest attack on Saudi Arabia is a retaliatory attack because of all the sanctions in place that essentially prevent Iran from selling its oil on the market. So, recognizing that there is a retaliatory attack, we can not continue this cycle of retaliation that can only lead to a total hell of a war, to the both in Iran and throughout the region, which would be so expensive and devastating that the war would result. we served in Iraq, which looks like a picnic compared to the lost lives of the United States, billions of dollars of taxpayers, already aggravating a terrible refugee crisis. It serves neither the interests of our people nor those of our national security. As President, I would now like to return to the Iranian nuclear deal, to remove those sanctions that were put in place for Iran to be reinstated in an agreement in which it would comply. We have visiting inspectors – because that does not happen every day, Iran is advancing in the development of a nuclear weapon. "
Harlow then referred to Gabbard's remarks on September 16 in which she had tweeted to Trump, "Despicable. Offering to place our military assets under the command of a foreign country – Saudi Arabia – is a shame and betrayal of my patriotic brothers and sisters in uniform and our Constitution. We are not your prostitutes. You are not our pimp.
.@realDonaldTrump Contemptible. Offering to place our military assets under the command of a foreign country – Saudi Arabia – is a shame and betrayal of my patriotic brothers and sisters in uniform and our Constitution. We are not your prostitutes. You are not our pimp. pic.twitter.com/Cu1OewEMOC
– Tulsi Gabbard (@TulsiGabbard) September 16, 2019
Harlow asked, "Do you regret the pence and language of the prostitute?
Gabbard is boasted:
Not at all. That's exactly what Trump does. He treats our troops as if we could be pledged or prostituted to the highest bidder. Our troops currently deployed in Saudi Arabia under his leadership do not serve the interests of the American people or our own national security. In the words of his government, they will protect Saudi Arabia's oil and Saudi Arabia's infrastructure, which compromises the reason we take this oath to give life for our country and he sends it to protect a country that is allied with our enemy, Al Qaeda.
[ad_2]
Source link