[ad_1]
On Tuesday night, US women's football star Megan Rapinoe appeared on MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show" to discuss her team's victory in the World Cup and, of course, politics. During the interview, Rapinoe actually pointed to the same argument about the so-called "gender pay gap" that has been repeatedly echoed from the right: women are paid less than men because they are not paid because they do not pay for it. they generate less income.
Maddow pointed out that US football fans in France were chanting "equal pay" shortly after the women's team won another World Cup final and asked the star striker how to help the fans do their homework. of equal pay a reality.
"Fans can come to the games, obviously the national team matches will be in great demand, but we have nine teams in the NWSL, you can watch your league matches, you can support that way, you can buy player jerseys You can lend your support in this way, you can talk to your friends, you can become season ticket holders, "replied Rapinoe.
In other words, fans can help the team generate more money, thus leading to higher pay for the players.
WATCH:
"I mean … uh … yes that's what we say from the beginning?" Answered popular conservative writer Stephen Miller via Twitter. "I mean, you can pick her up if you want. I have not some kind of ardent and passionate opposition to her. It does not matter. She literally says what the critics say. Buying games and attending games is exactly what you solve in the pay gap. So why is everyone fighting?
"She's right, that's how it works," said Christina Hoff Sommers, "feminist factual".
As Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire pointed out on Monday, the debate on "equal pay" around men's and women's football in the World Cup is ridiculous. In fact, women actually receive a salary higher percentage of income (13%) compared to men (9%), which theoretically means that women are overpaid.
Mike Ozania in Forbes explained:
"As Dwight Jaynes pointed out four years ago, after American women beat Japan to win the World Cup in Vancouver, there is a big difference in the income available to pay for the teams. The Women's World Cup brought in nearly $ 73 million, 13% of which to players. The 2010 Men's World Cup in South Africa brought in nearly $ 4 billion, 9% of which went to players.
Men always pull the trolley of the World Cup. The Men's World Cup in Russia generated more than $ 6 billion in revenue, with participating teams sharing $ 400 million, or less than 7% of revenues. Meanwhile, the Women's World Cup is expected to bring in $ 131 million for the full four-year cycle 2019-222 and distribute $ 30 million to participating teams. "
In addition to the stupid calls for "equal pay" and her undeniably impressive game, Rapinoe remained in the women's team for her protest against the national anthem. According to the athlete, refusing to put his hand on his heart during "The Star Spangled Banner" is an "F you" to President Donald Trump.
[ad_2]
Source link