We need to talk about Huawei's (alleged) theft

Last year, there was a sharp increase in the number of stories suggesting that Huawei was not a business that people should face. There are people in Washington who like to describe the telecom giant as the consumer electronics branch of the Chinese government. We have seen a steady stream of stories suggesting that Huawei is leading large scale industrial espionage.

This week, L & # 39; information issued a report claiming that Huawei was trying to take over all of Apple's trade secrets. Employees apparently have been ordered to contract with Apple component suppliers in the hope of knowing its secrets. In one case, a company that manufactures the coveted optical heart rate sensor for the Apple Watch has been targeted.

Last month, the Financial Times Huawei "has put in place a bonus system" to encourage workers to steal technology from competing companies. Then there was the Bloomberg report detailing an FBI attack on the ultra-resistant glass of an American startup that, it is alleged, Huawei allegedly attempted to reverse engineer. Not to mention the sound of Huawei's failed attempts to steal the T-Mobile phone test robot.

There are also Huawei's stories stealing the work of designers and artists to perform in his advertising campaigns. In 2018, DesignTaxi reported that the company had appropriated Paul McMahon's entertainment as a backdrop for his launch event. Similarly, but more strangely, designer Victoria Balva accused the company of diverting one of its designs from a glass dome to be installed in its new headquarters building.

Politically, Huawei was no longer welcome in the United States for some time, officials were suspicious of the close relations of society with the government. In early 2018, FBI director Chris Wray said he was concerned about allowing Huawei to build US mobile networks. He added that allowing him to provide an infrastructure would give him the "ability to conduct undetected spying".

It is not only the United States that is holding Huawei at arm's length or treating its demands with some skepticism. Australia, New Zealand and Poland have all issued official or de facto bans, and other countries, such as Germany and the United Kingdom, are watching the society closely. In the defense of Huawei, the company has maintained its innocence and geopolitical tensions are also at stake. Besides, its founder, Ren Zhengfei, promised that his company did not engage in espionage.

<img alt = "MateBook X Pro" data-caption = "SONY DSC" data-credit = "Daniel Cooper / Engadget" data-credit-link-back = "data-dam-provider =" data-local-id = "local-2 -5414035-1550664860653" data-media-id = "e48290dd-2de4-4354-9796-ef663265b090" data-original-url = "https://s.yimg.com/os/creatr-uploaded- images / 2019-19-02 / f838e700-3508-11e9-bcee-4690ff79a34e "data-title =" MateBook X Pro "src =" https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims?crop=1800%2C1196% 2C0% 2C0 & quality = 85 & format = jpg & de = fr = 1600% 2C1063 & image_uri = https% 3A% 2F% 2Fs.yim.com

It's not just the so-called dirty tricks of society going on behind the scenes, but the way they will ultimately affect us as users. Huawei is now the world's second largest smartphone supplier after Samsung. CNBC reports that the company has achieved nearly $ 100 billion in 2018, which means that what it does is a big deal. But until Huawei has made his way to the top with stolen ideas, and if so, what do we think about it?

The company has never hesitated to adopt the commercial dress of its competitors to sell its products. That's pretty glaring too, and most outlets, including this one, described the MateBook 13 as a clone or a look-alike for the MacBook Air. Interestingly, none of the reports forced the company to produce a very expensive scam of a competitor's product.

That's because this type of copy is so common that we have become blind to what it really means. The technology industry has a magical eye for all that is good – it takes it and hopes that no one will get upset. Look at Microsoft's alleged copy of Apple's graphical user interface in the late 80s, Samsung at the beginning of the mobile phone wars and Facebook that is blocking Snapchat right now.

Journalists have trouble calling this because we have come to accept it as a fact of life. I fell into this trap by examining Huawei's MateBook X Pro, which I believe was a "loving tribute" to the MacBook Pro. Rather than taking a stand, I have shed light on the similarities rather than being honest about what is happening here. Huawei deserves no praise for torn the MacBook Pro; although, he is applauding for improving the original.

And people care about what is happening in other areas, such as when a big fashion company snatches an independent designer. Watch Vox & # 39; s report of what happened when Old Navy ransacked a mother-and-baby mother-and-child t-shirt and was quickly flooded with bad reviews. Or the Samsung China barracks of Hypebeasts for its partnership "with fake legal" with Supreme Italia.

So that can not be the case if we do not care about companies that rip off others. The question is how much does it matter to you and will it be enough when the time has come to improve your phone?

Source link