Well then, who did the F – k do? All developments in the Adnan Syed case since the serial


Adnan SyedThe case is about to return to the court of public opinion.

More than four years later Sarah Koenig introduced to the world the 1999 murder of a Baltimore student Hae Min Lee and the subsequent conviction of his ex-boyfriend for the crime with the very popular podcast Serial, all turning us into armchair detectives, the question of whether or not Syed was shaken to prove that his alleged innocence will again become a topic of discussion for the water cooler talk with the beginning of the four-part series of HBO, rightly titled The Adnan Syed case. Oscar-nominated series debuts Sunday, March 10 Amy Berg, review the events that led to Lee's disappearance as well as the initial police investigation, while promising exclusive access to Syed and his family, new discoveries and revolutionary revelations meant to challenge the case of # 39; State.

"The film really picks up where Serial leave behind. There have been a lot of developments, especially in his case, but we are studying this whole story in depth. We take a lot of interesting paths you need, in my opinion, from the visual medium to explore, "Berg told E! News before the premiere.We talked to a lot of people who were not there during the podcast I think we're going much further now because time has helped us and Serial has discovered a lot of new information. So we hope we are closer to the truth now. "

In light of the most recent developments in the Syed case – the March 8th decision of the Maryland Court of Appeal, which reinstated her conviction, reinstating her conviction, forbidding her anyway From a new trial – we thought that it might be helpful to guide you. twists his story has taken since Serial aired his last episode of the first season in December 2014, leaving us all to debate the alleged accomplice Jay Wilds"Testimony, what Lee told Don, his boyfriend, who made the anonymous phone call to Syed, why could not Syed remember where he was when Lee was killed, whether or not there was a payphone in this fucking Best Buy parking lot, and, you know, who did it.

At the end of the season, Syed had already appealed to a higher court to appeal his case, alleging that his lawyer Christina Gutierrez had provided an ineffective lawyer. (Gutierrez, which was struck off in 2001 as a result of unrelated complaints filed against it by clients of the Statist Attorney grievance grievance Commission, died in 2004.) In February 2015, the Court of Special Appeals of the Maryland filed a decision authorizing Syed to appeal its conviction, using the fact that Gutierrez did not seek to negotiate a plea at Syed's second trial – the first was a nullity suit after the jury heard the judge characterize the deceased lawyer as "liar" – as a motive.

In May, the court ordered the Maryland Superior Court to consider the admissibility of Asia McClainGutierrez's testimony had been neglected or ignored. As Serial McClain claimed that she was with Syed at the exact moment when the prosecution claimed that he had attacked his ex-girlfriend in the Best Buy parking lot. In August, Justin BrownSyed's current attorney filed a petition that cell phone tower data that was essential to convict his client are also suspect and should be reviewed.

After the dismissal of the case in the lower court, McClain and others began to testify in February 2016 and, at the end of June, the judge Martin P. Welch of the Baltimore City Circuit Court granted Syed's motion for a stay after conviction, quashing the original conviction and seeking a new trial on the basis of mobile phone registers. McClain's testimony was, however, dismissed at that time. Almost immediately, the Maryland Attorney General's Office officially appealed the decision.

After a lengthy appeal, the Special Appeals Court decided on March 29, 2018, that the conviction should be quashed and that Syed be granted a new trial on all charges. According to the decision, they believed that Syed had received an ineffective lawyer because Gutierrez had not summoned McClain for testimony that, if it was believed, "would have prevented Syed from having murdered Hae".

"As a result, the conviction for murder of Syed must be set aside, and since his convictions for kidnapping, robbery and unlawful imprisonment rest on Hae's murder, those convictions must also be set aside," the jury wrote. "This case will be referred for a new trial on all charges against Syed."

The state had 30 days to appeal the decision, which they did, and on May 14, 2018, Maryland AG Brian FroshThe complainant's office argued that McClain's testimony would not have an impact on the original outcome of the case. As Lee's friends began to question McClain's testimony in the press, the Maryland Court of Appeal began hearing arguments during the Syed's new case on Nov. 29. 2018.

"A few years ago, Adnan thought that he had to agree to die in prison, and he now has the impression that he's likely to come home." He feels good. let's all feel good, Rabia Chaudry, lawyer and friend of Syed's family who brought the case to Serial and then launched his own podcast on the subject, undisclosed, told the Associated Press at the time.

Unfortunately, although these chances have drastically declined on Friday, when the Court of Appeals, the highest court of the state, said that Syed did not deserve a new trial. On a vote of three to three, they agreed with the lower court that Gutierrez's lawyer was "deficient" because of his failure to pursue the so-called alibi, but they did not think that this had prejudiced Syed, claiming that the evidence against him was strong enough. .

"Taking into account all of the evidence heard by the jury, we conclude that there is no substantial or substantial possibility that the verdict was different if counsel for the trial had presented "an alibi witness, the judge Clayton Greene Jr. written for the majority.

Following the decision, Brown tweeted, "We will not give up. #FreeAdnan." His longer statement said: "We are devastated by the decision of the Court of Appeal but we will not give up on Adnan Syed," he said later in a statement. "Unfortunately, we live in a binary criminal justice system in which we win or lose.Today we have lost by 4-3 votes.Our criminal justice system is in desperate need of reform. obstacles to holding a new trial are just too great. "

For now, Syed's options seem slim. He may file a motion for reconsideration with the Court of Appeal or ask the United States Supreme Court to hear the case, although both seem likely to dismiss it. He could also file a motion to reopen his post-conviction case using Welch's support for the claim of the cell tower. In any case, it will not go anywhere anytime soon.

For the moment, the court of public opinion will have to be sufficient.

"I hope that Adnan will have a new trial, because I know what he wants the most, it's all on the record," Berg told us. "But I do not think he'll ever get a new trial, so I think this film will serve him as a trial for many reasons."

The Adnan Syed case premieres on Sunday, March 10th at 10pm on HBO.

Source link